David F. Skoll wrote: > That's a bad design. Our system can accept mail to multiple > recipients with individual filtering and without running many > SpamAssassin processes in parallel. It can be done.
Indeed. Per Jessen wrote: > Sure, it's only a question of queueing. I'd join David and say it's a matter of design. Amavisd can do it too: handle multi-recipient messages efficiently, calling SpamAssassin only once per message (not once per recipient), yet still faithfully implementing per-recipient settings like score thresholds, black/whitelisting, bypassing certain checks, tagging (Subject, addr. extensions), defanging, ... Mark
