Am 24.02.2012 15:00, schrieb RW: > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 12:32:35 +0100 > Robert Schetterer wrote: >> > I am not realy sure if this fixes your problem but i have set >> > >> > score RDNS_NONE 0 >> > >> > cause the "default" points at this parameter looks like nonsense to me >> > i have also a scenario with private net relays which will not have any >> > reverse dns records ever > RDNS_NONE shouldn't fire on a private IP address unless you've done > something a bit "challenging". > >
it passed time since i last investigated in this, last i remember was the default value of this parameter was low in former versions , but was highed in recent there were working workarounds described somewhere at problems what definite happened was that it fired against private networks without rdns therefor i lowed it to null, with no siginficant loosing in spam tagging as i remember, there were good reasons described why it works now as it is , and workarounds would fix problems, but in my case i cant use them for other tec designed reasons, perhaps it was to harsh describe it as nonsense i should better say i dont like it in my place and i see no help in catching more spam in having its defaults -- Best Regards MfG Robert Schetterer Germany/Munich/Bavaria
