On 2/25/2012 2:07 PM, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Bowie Bailey, > > Am 2012-02-24 12:42:02, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: >> Why not? It doesn't have to be specific. "public41.tamay-dogan.net" >> would work fine. What is the downside of having a rDNS entry? > > ...because my ISP @office (Alice) offer only fixed IP (85.182.220.41) > with only but no rDNS, exactly, I have only > > e182220041.adsl.alicedsl.de. > > which interferer with my network.
Ok. So you DO have rDNS, just not a customized one. That should not cause problems in most cases. > >> Why are they rejected? Do you have any bounces with specific information? > > My mail server <mail.tamay-dogan.net> send me an error message back, > that the receiving MTA can not resolv <work1.intranet.tamay-dogan.net> > which is the first Received: header. That sounds like an MTA configuration. Why do you think it is related to SA? -- Bowie
