On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 19:17:36 +0100 Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > You haven't quoted any rules that are firing inappropriately. Do you > > have any evidence that this is anything to do with Spamassassin or > > reverse dns? > > ...because it is NOT my spamassassin which reject MY mails. So there's no reason to think this has anything to do with Spamassassin. On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 20:22:52 +0100 Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello Joe Sniderman, > > Am 2012-02-24 18:45:52, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > Strange. What tests are firing? > > I get only a MAILER-DAEMON message from <mail.tamay-dogan.net> that > the receiving MTA say, it can not resolv > <work1.intranet1.tamay-dogan.net>. I think that this is pretty conclusive that it's nothing to do with Spamassassin. It doesn't look anything like what I'd expect for a Spamassassin-based rejection. I looks like some basic MTA check. Another thing is that it's failing to find an A-record, so nothing to do with rDNS either. Have you checked to see if you are sending mail with an @work1.intranet1.tamay-dogan.net address in the smtp envelope.
