>That's a rotten idea when asking questions about RBLs... In this case, >asking about X.X. would have been less confusing.
Yes, I'm sorry and I've already given myself 30 lashings ! ;-( >Se we have two problems here: parsing IP addresses from inappropriate >headers, and (potentially) the RBL code doing lookups of RFC1918 > addresses. That's the point I'm trying to make here. SA is parsing from parts it should not be !! The whole Zen or no Zen thing that some others are going on about is not really relevant. SA should **NOT** be reading the parts it is !
