On 08/14/2013 05:02 PM, Nigel Smith wrote:


I wonder whether you should have chosen an RFC5737 address rather than an 
RFC1918 address for your obfuscation purposes...

Because I forgot about RFC5737.  ;-(
As I said, happy to give full un-munged headers off-list.

Nigel sent me the headers and the listed IP is NOT a private IP, but a legitimately PBL listing, a mobile ISP :)

His problem is his homebrew single "do it all" SA rule which does deep header checks against PBL instead of last-external.




Reply via email to