Am 26.03.2015 um 15:08 schrieb David F. Skoll:
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:05:06 +0100 Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:* spamass-milter -r 8.0 * messages above 8.0 are *rejected*Silently? Or do you generate an NDR? I'm genuinely curious as to how you:
i explained it multiple times, look at the logs at bottom From: Harald Reindl <reindl.har...@gmail.com> To: TL Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> Cc: ad...@rhsoft.net
1) Accept mail for some recipients
postfix hands different copies to the milter otherwise the won't have different Envelope-Headers
2) Reject mail for others
postfix hands different copies to the milter otherwise the won't have different Envelope-Headers
3) Without generating backscatter
why should postfix generate a backscatter?the connection to the delivering client is open, that's the purpose of a milter, postfix answers with a reject
4) Given that the messages are sent in the same SMTP session with multiple RCPTs and only one DATA.
boah postfix responds with a "postfix/cleanup[21827]: 3lCS043tlCz1l: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE" to the delivering client and the server on the other side generates a bounce containing the reject message
the only question i ask myself is why i waste my time with so much ignorance and provocation on the other sideDon't call people names, please. It's a waste of bandwidth. I think I've been pretty polite and I also believe I have pretty good sysadmin/email credentials
one message is to the adrress i am using here is delivered, the other to ad...@rhsoft.net got rejected by the milter and even the bounce from gmail contains the correct one
Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[21928]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: client=mail-ig0-f179.google.com[209.85.213.179] Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21927]: 3lCT6v6FXRz1y: message-id=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw spamd[5735]: spamd: processing message <CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> for sa-milt:189 Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21832]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: message-id=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw spamd[5736]: spamd: processing message <CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> for sa-milt:189
_________________________________________________ [root@mail-gw:~]$ cat maillog | grep 3lCT6v6FXRz1yMar 26 15:22:47 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[21940]: 3lCT6v6FXRz1y: client=mail-ie0-f177.google.com[209.85.223.177] Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21927]: 3lCT6v6FXRz1y: message-id=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> Mar 26 15:22:51 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21927]: 3lCT6v6FXRz1y: milter-reject: END-OF-MESSAGE from mail-ie0-f177.google.com[209.85.223.177]: 5.7.1 Blocked by Spamfilter; from=<reindl.har...@gmail.com> to=<ad...@rhsoft.net> proto=ESMTP helo=<mail-ie0-f177.google.com>
[root@mail-gw:~]$ cat maillog | grep 3lCT6w0F9Fz20Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/smtpd[21928]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: client=mail-ig0-f179.google.com[209.85.213.179] Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21832]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: message-id=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> Mar 26 15:22:53 mail-gw postfix/qmgr[7240]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: from=<reindl.har...@gmail.com>, size=2144, nrcpt=1 (queue active) Mar 26 15:22:53 mail-gw postfix/smtp[22684]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: to=<h.rei...@thelounge.net>, relay=10.0.0.15[10.0.0.15]:10027, delay=5.7, delays=5.6/0/0.04/0.01, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 2.0.0 Ok: queued as 3lCT715134z36)
Mar 26 15:22:53 mail-gw postfix/qmgr[7240]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: removed _________________________________________________[root@mail-gw:~]$ cat maillog | grep CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21927]: 3lCT6v6FXRz1y: message-id=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw spamd[5735]: spamd: processing message <CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> for sa-milt:189 Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw postfix/cleanup[21832]: 3lCT6w0F9Fz20: message-id=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> Mar 26 15:22:48 mail-gw spamd[5736]: spamd: processing message <CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com> for sa-milt:189 Mar 26 15:22:51 mail-gw spamd[5735]: spamd: result: Y 10 - BAYES_50,CUST_DNSWL_4,CUST_DNSWL_5,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,URIBL_BLACK scantime=3.2,size=2076,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.5,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=19453,mid=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com>,bayes=0.499601,autolearn=disabled Mar 26 15:22:53 mail-gw spamd[5736]: spamd: result: . 4 - BAYES_50,CUST_DNSWL_4,CUST_DNSWL_5,CUST_MOST_SPAM_TO,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS,TVD_SPACE_RATIO,URIBL_BLACK scantime=5.3,size=2095,user=sa-milt,uid=189,required_score=5.5,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=19455,mid=<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com>,bayes=0.499644,autolearn=disabled
_________________________________________________
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
ad...@rhsoft.net
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server
for the recipient domain rhsoft.net by mail-gw.thelounge.net.
[91.118.73.19].
The error that the other server returned was:550 5.7.1 Blocked by Spamfilter, please forward this to YOUR tech-support first, time: Mar 26 15:22:51, client: 209.85.223.177, server: mail-gw.thelounge.net, contact: <postmas...@thelounge.net> +4315953999
----- Original message -----
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
bh=rZ88tIuyvZY7stqgf80rznf9nvDSV06tEYN4V5haGjU=;
b=uoGlds4gqpJ/2XVOBxV6xRzpQD7o7GEspHIEsnZXiqFgtodLGjkjvzLZVTGe92LKmy
6cAnPxgV3BD+Gi1vDQiGmWE7HkHASTjQU7dHywjc5HvCLDTAYT85YwY9vk7erXqGiF+3
TCZUzI3d1nJuG6Eaw0TZhgRIhhyEiSplIn/RMl3DVqwl59LperVY+vIC6K9GkTQiV6QO
a89c4EIcw5W+TSmhTeTyVEUAwKOqKOgXpJNEWzIsyFYJvchH94JrUq1sNsrKMOpqaBh2
zHWXWbCEXOOetc6+36Pe74o1dmHVeKGJd7tZQm+aWjdvyC65jtDKmzAR0sW41V84AtWM
OaOQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.165.68 with SMTP id o65mr21526283ioe.56.1427379766436;
Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.64.248.228 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Mar 2015 07:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2015 15:22:46 +0100
Message-ID:
<CAAcbkvN7BpCmrEkgfiMZBbxi51Exp5428Vnv4YQuaH6g=l7...@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: URIBL AGAIN From: Harald Reindl <reindl.har...@gmail.com> To: TL Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> Cc: ad...@rhsoft.net Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141bc5af0294e051231bff8
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
