Am 30.05.2016 um 16:35 schrieb Nick Howitt:
Just for a bit of closure, it looks like when you use amavisd-new with SA, it is amavisd-new and not SA which is adding the X-Spam headers. In /etc/amavisd/api.conf there is a parameter, $sa_tag_level_deflt, defaulted to -99, below which no X-Spam headers are set. If you whitelist, you start at -100. So, if the rest of the tests total to less than 1, you will not get an X-Spam header. This can be confirmed by playing around with this parameter and by upping the amavisd log level so you can see the results of all the spam tests for each e-mail even if it does not get the X-Spam headers.
well, the next time save us from your arrogance like below and accept that people with knowledge are knowing what they are talking about because otherwise you won't need to ask :-)
Am 26.05.2016 um 12:22 schrieb Nick Howitt: > On 2016-05-26 10:08, Reindl Harald wrote: >> like above with the SA-setting *you do not read* what others are >> answering - you are likely on the wrong mailing-list because you are >> runnung *AMAVIS* which is not a pure spamassassin and can skip SA >> based on several settings > I get the drift. SA is perfect and has no bugs > so it is not worth doing any diagnostics. The > people on the amavis lists will acknowledge this > and assume, therefore, that it is their product > causing the issue. There is no chance that the > amavis people will say it is an SA issue
On 26/05/2016 07:17, Nick Howitt wrote:On 26/05/2016 00:29, Reindl Harald wrote:Am 25.05.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Nick Howitt:and what is the problem run a local unbound on port 1053 and just add "dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053" to your SA-configuration when one thinks he is capable to run his own servers?I've tried looking and failed. Any chance of pointing me to where this is documented?seriously? unbound.conf: interface: 127.0.0.1 port: 1053 /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: dns_server [127.0.0.1]:1053 https://www.google.com/search?q=unbound.conf https://www.google.com/search?q=spamassassin+dns_serverSeriously, yes. I'd found and set up unbound OK, if you'd read another of my posts. I had not found it for SA. Not good searching, but I had not - and I'd tried a few of the links on google and the some man pages. OK, I've been heavily shot at for my set up which is totally irrelevant to the question I posed and not a pleasant experience. Is there any possibility of some help with the problem I posted about?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
