> > -----Original Message----- > > From: David Darj [mailto:z...@alagazam.net] > > Sent: Tuesday, 27 April 2010 6:26 AM > > To: Cooke, Mark > > Cc: users@subversion.apache.org; Troy Simpson > > Subject: Re: Tigris binary packages for Windows > > > > On 2010-04-26 13:58, Cooke, Mark wrote: > > > Hi David, list, > > > > > > > > >>>>> On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>> I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come > > >>>>> forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the > > >>>>> windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11 > > >>>>> announced a few days ago. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> From: David Darj [mailto:z...@alagazam.net] > > >>>> Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21 > > >>>> > > >>>> I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11 > > >>>> They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net > > >>>> You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it. > > >>>> > > >>>> The reason I've not announced the release in this (users) > > >>>> list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list > > >>>> (where I did announce it) to download and test it first so > > >>>> I know my build environment is okey. > > >>>> As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running > > >>>> ok., but the bindings has not been tested. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>> On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote: > > >>> > > >>> You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with > > >>> apache 2.2 on windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings > > >>> (to Trac using mod_wsgi) and report back... > > >>> > > >>> > > >> From: David Darj [mailto:z...@alagazam.net] > > >> Sent: 23 April 2010 18:08 > > >> > > >> Thanx that would be gr8. > > >> > > > So far so good. Minor points but the ".11" package readme still > > refers > > > to ".9" > > Oh...thats my fault missing to change the version number in > some spots. > > I think I was focused on getting the dependecies versions right. > > > and some of the files have a different name format from the > > > tigris packages, e.g.: > > > > > > o svn-python-1.6.6.win32-py2.6.exe > > > o svn-win32-1.6.11_py.zip > > > > > > ...although I realise one is an installer and the other just the > > files. > > > > > You're right, the first one is an installer and the second > one only the > > files. > > If you look at tigris download page a bit further down you see the > > corresponding zip-file there as well. > > I've just havn't looked into byinding these installers. > > > Actually, I am unsure about installing the latter, can I just copy > > the > > > files over the ones I already have installed or do I need to tell > > python > > > about it somehow (probably OT for this list I guess, > perhaps Troy is > > > listening)? > > > > > I'm not a python programmer so I don't really know how to > install this > > package (thats why the bindings are not tested). > > But I suppose you can just extract the file over the old ones. > > Actually it's not Troy that used to build the python > installers, it was > > DJ Heap, who also used to build the binaries. > > Maybe he has some info on this matter. > > > > > >>> Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile > (there were > > >>> suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some > > potential > > >>> issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build > > which > > >>> > > > I > > > > > >>> am required to use here): > > >>> > > >>> > > >> It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did. > > >> That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be > distributed with it. > > >> > > >> > > > Excellent, thanks again. > > > > > > > > >>> Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I > > >>> assume that he would be able to put them on tigris at least > > >>> until we get a new home on apache: > > >>> > > >>> > > >> I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to > > >> him as well. So if he is reading it it would be great if he > > >> (or anyone else) want to put the there. > > >> > > >> > > > It would be really great if Troy could pick up the baton > here as that > > > would negate my python install issues. > > > > > > All the best, > > > > > > ~ mark c > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Troy Simpson [mailto:t...@ebswift.com] > Sent: 09 May 2010 23:47 > > Looks like we're getting closer to official binaries then... > As far as the python bindings installer goes, that's something > I know nothing about. I have new code for the windows WiX-based > installer, but thus far haven't had any commit access to place > the code back in. The WiX code in the repository has 'issues'. > > Regards, > > Troy > I will try to investigate the python issue but its probably not going to be this week *sigh*
~ mark c
