On 2010-04-23 10:29, Cooke, Mark wrote:
On 2010-04-22 17:06, Cooke, Mark wrote:
I am resurrecting this thread to ask if anyone has come
forward to volunteer time and/or effort to resurrect the
windoze binaries as we are still on 1.6.6 against 1.6.11
announced a few days ago.
From: David Darj [mailto:z...@alagazam.net]
Sent: 22 April 2010 21:21
I have built both 1.6.9 and 1.6.11
They are available on my webpage http://alagazam.net
You (and anyone else) is welcome to download and use it.
The reason I've not announced the release in this (users)
list is that I've hoped some people reading the dev list
(where I did announce it) to download and test it first so
I know my build environment is okey.
As the web page says all test on subversion itself is running
ok., but the bindings has not been tested.
You star! Thanks very much. I will do some testing with apache 2.2 on
windoze using mod_dav_svn and python bindings (to Trac using mod_wsgi)
and report back...
Thanx that would be gr8.
Out of interest, did you use VC6 or VC2008 to compile (there were
suggestions earlier in the thread that there might be some potential
issues using VC2008 binaries against the official apache build which I
am required to use here):
It's built using the good old VC6 like D.J Heap previously did.
That way no runtime-dll:s (msvcr*) needs to be distributed with it.
From: Mark Phippard [mailto:markp...@gmail.com]
Sent: 03 March 2010 14:27
One other "pain" I thought of is that ideally the binaries
should be built using MSVC 6.0 (I am assuming DJ has not
changed that). Since the httpd binaries are built using that
you can have problems if a newer Visual Studio is used for
mod_dav_svn. You also have to deal with distributing the MS
runtime libraries if a newer version is used.
Also, did you hook up with Troy about the installers ~ I assume that he
would be able to put them on tigris at least until we get a new home on
apache:
I havn't had any contact with troy, but this mail is cc:d to him as well.
So if he is reading it it would be great if he (or anyone else) want to
put the there.
From: Troy Simpson [mailto:t...@ebswift.com]
Sent: 02 March 2010 02:45
I can still build the installer, but I have never built
binaries. The installer code in the repository is NOT the
latest code. I had lost commit access for a time during the
transition and by the time I got that access back there are
no more binaries, so it has been pointless to continue
development. If someone could produce binaries I could get
the installer back on track, otherwise it's not worth
spending any time on if the project will not support (as in
supply) windows binaries.
~ mark c
/David
