If theres a migration path to be had, then Im more than interested in tapestry 5.
Actually, the one feature I think id like to see at this point (save for some small its-still-not-final issues with tapestry 4.1) is the ability to add components programatically. Everything else seems to be on par or better with anything else out there (PRADO, ASP.NET, Echo, Wicket, JSF (eew)...) (in both technical merit and usability) As to the migration path, im not even saying Im opposed to using an evil regex requiring a cluster of perl installations and some holy water to work ;-) if that's what it takes, but its got to be in place. Peace, Josh On 7/30/06, Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nice, Now it would be great if some of the people who complain about lack of stability actually helped in the migration path. I see some people who are pretty old Tapestry users. -- Ing. Leonardo Quijano Vincenzi DTQ Software Web Application Design and Programming http://www.dtqsoftware.com Jesse Kuhnert escribió: > I really don't see what all the fuss is about anymore. I've already > stated > that I'll be providing "some" form of T4 extension to upgrade to T5 > when the > time comes for it. > > I've been wanting some of the features in T5 almost since the first day I > started using Tapestry. I'm willing to go through the pain of > developing a > T4 upgrade extension to it if that's what it takes to get me there. I > feel > very comforatable with most of the code in T4 now . > > So..There we have it. :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
