Alexander, I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Tapestry cannot be revived. Tapestry has been in coma for too long. As you may know, people who have been in coma for a very long time cannot be revived. They ultimately die, as Tapestry is slowly dying now. Check the article found at http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/. Choose one of those frameworks mentioned there and you'll be fine.
Cheers On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Alexander Sommer < alexander.som...@gmail.com> wrote: > tapestry would and will easily revive if 5.4. would come out with full > jQuery (and jQuery mobile) support ;-) > > I am just waiting for 5.4 and think that others are doing the same. > > I also would love mobile web templates with 5.4 based on jQuery mobile. > > > 2013/11/20 Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us> > > > What a troll!! > > > > On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote: > > > > > Guys, > > > > > > You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to see > the > > > reality. The fact of the matter is Tapestry is no more relevant in the > > > developers community. Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in his > > > projects. Stop being stupid and look around for a better alternative. > > Your > > > knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job anywhere. > > > Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home. As we're speaking > > now, > > > Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's project.Leave this cult > and > > > do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an > > > inevitable death. > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Norman Franke <nor...@myasd.com> > > wrote: > > > > > >> That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Someone who doesn't know > > any > > >> better about how to write a modern web application and insists that > JSP > > >> code is "closer to the bare metal" and thus better. > > >> > > >> Norman Franke > > >> Answering Service for Directors, Inc. > > >> www.myasd.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil > > >> old incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and > > feels > > >> bad about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties). > > >>> ----- Original Message ----- > > >>> From: Lance Java > > >>> To: Tapestry users > > >>> Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:38 PM > > >>> Subject: Re: Web frameworks > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this > > >>> tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar > to > > >>> this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this > > thread. > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Hi guys, > > >>>> > > >>>> There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be > found > > >> here: > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/ > > >>>> > > >>>> To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me > > very > > >>>> nervous to even consider Tapestry for our upcoming project. I'm > scared > > >>>> Tapestry may be abandoned one day and leave us in the cold. It may > be > > a > > >>>> nice framework, but Tapestry's popularity is extremely low within > the > > >>>> developers' community. Why is that? Is it because of it's track > record > > >> on > > >>>> releases and backward compatibility issues, which I read a lot about > > on > > >>>> google search? Or is it because it's a one man project? > > >>>> > > >>>> What do you think? > > >>>> > > >>>> Regards, > > >>>> Emmanuel > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > >
