Emmanuel,
please stop your spam. This is a mailing list for developers even stupid
ones like us using tapestry.
Create your little Facebook page name it "Tapestry sucks" add a "I
dislike it too" button or something else and we all can continue with
more serious stuff.
Jens
Am 20.11.13 22:12, schrieb Emmanuel Sowah:
Alexander,
I'm sorry to disappoint you, but Tapestry cannot be revived. Tapestry has
been in coma for too long. As you may know, people who have been in coma
for a very long time cannot be revived. They ultimately die, as Tapestry is
slowly dying now. Check the article found at
http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/.
Choose one of those frameworks mentioned there and you'll be fine.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Alexander Sommer <
alexander.som...@gmail.com> wrote:
tapestry would and will easily revive if 5.4. would come out with full
jQuery (and jQuery mobile) support ;-)
I am just waiting for 5.4 and think that others are doing the same.
I also would love mobile web templates with 5.4 based on jQuery mobile.
2013/11/20 Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>
What a troll!!
On Nov 20, 2013, at 2:52 PM, Emmanuel Sowah wrote:
Guys,
You Tapestry aficionados are just some radicals who are blind to see
the
reality. The fact of the matter is Tapestry is no more relevant in the
developers community. Even Mr. Ship doesn't use Tapestry anymore in his
projects. Stop being stupid and look around for a better alternative.
Your
knowledge and experience about Tapestry won't land you a job anywhere.
Tapestry is now only used on hobby projects at home. As we're speaking
now,
Howard is happily coding Wicket on a client's project.Leave this cult
and
do something better with serious frameworks. Tapestry is dying an
inevitable death.
Cheers
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Norman Franke <nor...@myasd.com>
wrote:
That's funny, I was thinking the same thing. Someone who doesn't know
any
better about how to write a modern web application and insists that
JSP
code is "closer to the bare metal" and thus better.
Norman Franke
Answering Service for Directors, Inc.
www.myasd.com
On Nov 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, John <j...@quivinco.com> wrote:
Haha. Maybe it's someone who's maintaining thousands of lines of evil
old incomprehensible JSP, has seen the promised land (Tapestry) and
feels
bad about it. (Like the guy who never gets invited to parties).
----- Original Message -----
From: Lance Java
To: Tapestry users
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2013 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Web frameworks
I'm not sure why... but for some reason a random user comes on this
tapestry list about once a year spreading FUD with a message similar
to
this one. I've never really understood why... Please ignore this
thread.
On 18 November 2013 19:12, Emmanuel Sowah <eso...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi guys,
There is a great report that compares web frameworks and can be
found
here:
http://zeroturnaround.com/rebellabs/the-2014-decision-makers-guide-to-java-web-frameworks/
To my surprise, Tapestry didn't make it to the list. This makes me
very
nervous to even consider Tapestry for our upcoming project. I'm
scared
Tapestry may be abandoned one day and leave us in the cold. It may
be
a
nice framework, but Tapestry's popularity is extremely low within
the
developers' community. Why is that? Is it because of it's track
record
on
releases and backward compatibility issues, which I read a lot about
on
google search? Or is it because it's a one man project?
What do you think?
Regards,
Emmanuel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
