Hibernate is not J2EE "based". It just so happens it provides a EJB-free solution to a servlet container environment. Hibernate does not require J2EE.
Tim -----Original Message----- From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 8:04 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: From Java to C#, ASP.NET [Off Topic] On 1/30/06, Endre Stølsvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2006, Leon Rosenberg wrote: > > | On 1/29/06, David Tonhofer, m-plify S.A. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > | > Another 2c: When doing Java, you may want to stay clear of J2EE. I > | > have heard it's the Wooly Mammoth framework and I have so far > | > worked happily without it. I recommend a look at Bruce Tate's pamphlet here: > | > > | > <http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/bfljava/> > | > > | > | Stay clear of J2EE? Not really possible, especially with your book > | recommendation, hibernate and spring are heavily J2EE based. Or did > | you mean EJB? > > How are they "J2EE based"? > JDBC is part of J2EE. JTA is part of J2EE. Servlets are part of J2EE. And spring states itself as: Welcome to the home of the Spring Framework. As the leading full-stack Java/J2EE application framework, Spring delivers significant benefits for many projects, reducing development effort and costs while improving test coverage and quality. > Regards, > Endre. > Leon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
