On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Pieter, > > > > I added the ResizablePanel component and deployed the snapshot release > > (wicket-jquery-ui-core-6.2.1-SNAPSHOT) > > > > You may find how it works on the demo site: > > http://www.7thweb.net/wicket-jquery-ui/resizable/ResizablePanelPage > > > > > IMHO, it would make more sense to have that feature as a behavior instead > of a panel... that way you are not forcing an inheritance. On wiquery this > is done as an "adapter" that is passed to a behavior. > > There is a behavior is as well: http://www.7thweb.net/wicket-jquery-ui/resizable/DefaultResizablePage > > > > I hope it will suit your use case, do not hesitate to come back to me if > > you have any questions... > > > > Best regards, > > Sebastien. > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Pieter, hi Martin, > > > > > > As you are using wicket 6 and wicket-jquery-ui 6, there is no version > > > conflict because wicket-jquery-ui relies on wicket's embedded jquery > > core, > > > so there is only one reference of jquery-js > > > > > > But a problem may arise: > > > - if you are youself using a version of jquery core javascript, for > other > > > needs. > > > - if you are using severals jquery ui integrations. The conflict may > > > occurs with jquery-ui javascript library (probably not with the jquery > > > core), you have to provide you own jquery-ui JSRR, as Martin mentioned, > > and > > > remove these used by the integrations. Caution, if you prefer to remove > > the > > > JSRR of only one integration (using the code I provide earlier) and let > > the > > > one of another integration, you will get into trouble if you use a > > > component of the first integration but none of the second integration > on > > a > > > same page, because no jquery-ui javascript library will be rendered in > > that > > > case... > > > > > > Best regards, > > > Sebastien. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Martin Grigorov < > mgrigo...@apache.org > > >wrote: > > > > > >> Hi Pieter, > > >> > > >> Both Wicket and the libraries which integrate with jQuery UI provide > > ways > > >> to setup custom JavaScriptResourceReference (JSRR) that loads > jquery.js. > > >> The easiest way is to tell the jquery-ui integration library to not > > >> contribute its JSRR at all. Only Wicket will contribute it. > > >> > > >> If for some reason you need different version of jquery.js than the > one > > >> that comes with Wicket itself then you can use the APIs explained by > > >> Sebastien to use your custom JSRR. > > >> Wicket is smart enough to filter several contributions of the same > > >> resource > > >> and actually render it just once. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Pieter Claassen <pie...@musmato.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > Sebastien, > > >> > > > >> > So by including the wicket-jquery-ui (if I follow the installation > > >> > instructions), does that not conflict with the jquery core library? > > >> > > > >> > Regards, > > >> > Pieter > > >> > > > >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > > >> > > Hi Pieter, > > >> > > > > >> > > Yes, wicket is embedding jquery core library. If you include > another > > >> > jquery > > >> > > core well yes, you will probably get into troubles. > > >> > > > > >> > > If you really want to do that, you can specify your own jQuery > core > > >> > library > > >> > > version, in Wicket Application#init(): > > >> > > > > >> > > IJavaScriptLibrarySettings settings = > > getJavaScriptLibrarySettings(); > > >> > > settings.setJQueryReference(new MyJQueryReference()); > > >> > > > > >> > > About conflicts with existing Wicket / jQuery UI implementation, > > >> that's > > >> > the > > >> > > same, only one jQuery UI library version should be loaded at a > time. > > >> > > In wicket-jquery-ui, you can change or remove the shipped library > in > > >> the > > >> > > same way: > > >> > > > > >> > > IJQueryLibrarySettings settings = new JQueryLibrarySettings(); > > >> > > > > >> > > settings.setJQueryReference(new MyJQueryReference()); // (jquery > > core, > > >> > same > > >> > > code as above) > > >> > > settings.setJQueryUIReference(new > > >> > > JQueryPluginResourceReference(MyApplication.class, > > >> > > "jquery-ui-x.x.x.min.js")); //new jquery ui version > > >> > > or > > >> > > settings.setJQueryUIReference(null) //removes jquery ui library > > >> > > > > >> > > this.setJavaScriptLibrarySettings(settings); > > >> > > > > >> > > Hope this helps, > > >> > > Sebastien. > > >> > > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Pieter Claassen < > > pie...@musmato.com > > >> > > >wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > > Hi Sebastian, > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Thanks. Wicket 6.5 is what I am using. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > As to your question: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > I am referring to the fact that Wicket documentation mentioned > > that > > >> > > JQuery > > >> > > > has been selected for the internal AJax implementation in > Wicket. > > I > > >> > take > > >> > > > that means that there is a JQuery JS library that ships with > > >> > Wicket-core > > >> > > > and also wicket code that makes use of that library. If I now > > >> include > > >> > my > > >> > > > own JQuery library and CSS, is there not a risk that both these > > >> > > libraries, > > >> > > > with mostly the same functions but potentially version skew, > could > > >> be > > >> > > > loaded by the same page? > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Also, I note that there are a number wicket-jquery projects out > > >> there. > > >> > > How > > >> > > > do they play together and not trample the internal Wicket > > >> > implementation. > > >> > > > > > >> > > > Regards, > > >> > > > Pieter > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Pieter > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > I am not sure to undestand your first point. What libraries > are > > >> you > > >> > > > > refering to? Internal wicket's library? A jQuery plugin? > > Another? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > About your second point, the ResizeBehavior does not currently > > >> > > implement > > >> > > > > the 'resize' event (which can retrieve size & position). > > >> > > > > To stay consistent with the current logic behind > > >> wicket-jquery-ui, I > > >> > > will > > >> > > > > do a ResizePanel which will support such event. > > >> > > > > That's not a big deal, I will look at this tonight... > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Are you using Wicket 1.5.x or 6.x? > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks & best regards, > > >> > > > > Sebastien. > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Pieter Claassen < > > >> pie...@musmato.com > > >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > This is a general best practice question. I am using > > >> > wicket-jquery-ui > > >> > > > > > because I don't seem to be able to find a resizable panel in > > the > > >> > > > > > internal wicket ajax widgets. > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > 1. Is there no problem loading new jquery libraries over the > > >> wicket > > >> > > > > > implementation? What is best practice? > > >> > > > > > 2. I am looking for a way to get the resized panels' x and y > > >> size > > >> > > > > > parameters into my wicket code? Any suggestions how to do > > this? > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > > >> > > > > > Pieter > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > > >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > users-h...@wicket.apache.org > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > -- > > >> > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > >> > > > Pieter Claassen > > >> > > > Musmato B.V. > > >> > > > e: pieter.claas...@musmato.com > > >> > > > t: +31 877 848259 > > >> > > > w: http://musmato.com > > >> > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > -- > > >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > >> > Pieter Claassen > > >> > Musmato B.V. > > >> > e: pieter.claas...@musmato.com > > >> > t: +31 877 848259 > > >> > w: http://musmato.com > > >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Martin Grigorov > > >> jWeekend > > >> Training, Consulting, Development > > >> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > Antilia Soft > http://antiliasoft.com/ <http://antiliasoft.com/antilia> > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
