Hi Ernesto, Hi Martin, > IMHO, it would make more sense to have that feature as a behavior instead of a panel... that way you are not forcing an inheritance For this point, I was not sure whether to make a WebMarkupContainer or a Panel that, you are true, force the inheritance.
But actually the main discussion here is... Is it the role of a Behavior to handle callbacks or it is the role of a Wicket component to handle these, or both. I thought about this at the beginning of the project. I wanted to have a component oriented API, as Wicket is, and to be the closest as possible in term of phylosophy and coding pratice. My conclusion was that, but maybe am I wrong, that it is the responsibility of the Component to handle callbacks, not the Behavior. (but in another hand, Wicket's Behavior are exposing callback sometimes, but mainly Components are doing so) Sure, it is not a big redesign to make both the Component and the Behavior to handle callback, but I would like to be sure it fit Wicket's philosophy. Ernesto, thanks for your input. I would like other inputs on that subject before changing the way the API is designed. Best regards, Sebastien. On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > HI > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org > >wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:31 AM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > >> reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:38 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > Hi Pieter, > >> > > > >> > > I added the ResizablePanel component and deployed the snapshot > release > >> > > (wicket-jquery-ui-core-6.2.1-SNAPSHOT) > >> > > > >> > > You may find how it works on the demo site: > >> > > http://www.7thweb.net/wicket-jquery-ui/resizable/ResizablePanelPage > >> > > > >> > > > >> > IMHO, it would make more sense to have that feature as a behavior > >> instead > >> > of a panel... that way you are not forcing an inheritance. On wiquery > >> this > >> > is done as an "adapter" that is passed to a behavior. > >> > > >> > > >> There is a behavior is as well: > >> http://www.7thweb.net/wicket-jquery-ui/resizable/DefaultResizablePage > >> > > > > does seem ---> DOES NOT SEEM......... below... mornings:-() > > > > Yes I have looked at the behavior example as well... but behavior does > >> seem to support (at least at the example) to plug in anything to make it > >> listen to resize call backs. Maybe it does and it isn't shown at the > >> code... > >> > > > > Well my point is that it makes more sense to have this as "an adapter" > > added to a behavior than having a panel. E.g. You a have a data table > that > > you want to make resizable and want to remember new sizes at server > side... > > Panel won't help you there. > > > > > > >> > > >> > > I hope it will suit your use case, do not hesitate to come back to > me > >> if > >> > > you have any questions... > >> > > > >> > > Best regards, > >> > > Sebastien. > >> > > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Pieter, hi Martin, > >> > > > > >> > > > As you are using wicket 6 and wicket-jquery-ui 6, there is no > >> version > >> > > > conflict because wicket-jquery-ui relies on wicket's embedded > jquery > >> > > core, > >> > > > so there is only one reference of jquery-js > >> > > > > >> > > > But a problem may arise: > >> > > > - if you are youself using a version of jquery core javascript, > for > >> > other > >> > > > needs. > >> > > > - if you are using severals jquery ui integrations. The conflict > may > >> > > > occurs with jquery-ui javascript library (probably not with the > >> jquery > >> > > > core), you have to provide you own jquery-ui JSRR, as Martin > >> mentioned, > >> > > and > >> > > > remove these used by the integrations. Caution, if you prefer to > >> remove > >> > > the > >> > > > JSRR of only one integration (using the code I provide earlier) > and > >> let > >> > > the > >> > > > one of another integration, you will get into trouble if you use a > >> > > > component of the first integration but none of the second > >> integration > >> > on > >> > > a > >> > > > same page, because no jquery-ui javascript library will be > rendered > >> in > >> > > that > >> > > > case... > >> > > > > >> > > > Best regards, > >> > > > Sebastien. > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Martin Grigorov < > >> > mgrigo...@apache.org > >> > > >wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > >> Hi Pieter, > >> > > >> > >> > > >> Both Wicket and the libraries which integrate with jQuery UI > >> provide > >> > > ways > >> > > >> to setup custom JavaScriptResourceReference (JSRR) that loads > >> > jquery.js. > >> > > >> The easiest way is to tell the jquery-ui integration library to > not > >> > > >> contribute its JSRR at all. Only Wicket will contribute it. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> If for some reason you need different version of jquery.js than > the > >> > one > >> > > >> that comes with Wicket itself then you can use the APIs explained > >> by > >> > > >> Sebastien to use your custom JSRR. > >> > > >> Wicket is smart enough to filter several contributions of the > same > >> > > >> resource > >> > > >> and actually render it just once. > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Pieter Claassen < > >> pie...@musmato.com> > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Sebastien, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > So by including the wicket-jquery-ui (if I follow the > >> installation > >> > > >> > instructions), does that not conflict with the jquery core > >> library? > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Pieter > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Sebastien <seb...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hi Pieter, > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Yes, wicket is embedding jquery core library. If you include > >> > another > >> > > >> > jquery > >> > > >> > > core well yes, you will probably get into troubles. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > If you really want to do that, you can specify your own > jQuery > >> > core > >> > > >> > library > >> > > >> > > version, in Wicket Application#init(): > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > IJavaScriptLibrarySettings settings = > >> > > getJavaScriptLibrarySettings(); > >> > > >> > > settings.setJQueryReference(new MyJQueryReference()); > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > About conflicts with existing Wicket / jQuery UI > >> implementation, > >> > > >> that's > >> > > >> > the > >> > > >> > > same, only one jQuery UI library version should be loaded at > a > >> > time. > >> > > >> > > In wicket-jquery-ui, you can change or remove the shipped > >> library > >> > in > >> > > >> the > >> > > >> > > same way: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > IJQueryLibrarySettings settings = new > JQueryLibrarySettings(); > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > settings.setJQueryReference(new MyJQueryReference()); // > >> (jquery > >> > > core, > >> > > >> > same > >> > > >> > > code as above) > >> > > >> > > settings.setJQueryUIReference(new > >> > > >> > > JQueryPluginResourceReference(MyApplication.class, > >> > > >> > > "jquery-ui-x.x.x.min.js")); //new jquery ui version > >> > > >> > > or > >> > > >> > > settings.setJQueryUIReference(null) //removes jquery ui > library > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > this.setJavaScriptLibrarySettings(settings); > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Hope this helps, > >> > > >> > > Sebastien. > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Pieter Claassen < > >> > > pie...@musmato.com > >> > > >> > > >wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > Hi Sebastian, > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Thanks. Wicket 6.5 is what I am using. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > As to your question: > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > I am referring to the fact that Wicket documentation > >> mentioned > >> > > that > >> > > >> > > JQuery > >> > > >> > > > has been selected for the internal AJax implementation in > >> > Wicket. > >> > > I > >> > > >> > take > >> > > >> > > > that means that there is a JQuery JS library that ships > with > >> > > >> > Wicket-core > >> > > >> > > > and also wicket code that makes use of that library. If I > now > >> > > >> include > >> > > >> > my > >> > > >> > > > own JQuery library and CSS, is there not a risk that both > >> these > >> > > >> > > libraries, > >> > > >> > > > with mostly the same functions but potentially version > skew, > >> > could > >> > > >> be > >> > > >> > > > loaded by the same page? > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Also, I note that there are a number wicket-jquery projects > >> out > >> > > >> there. > >> > > >> > > How > >> > > >> > > > do they play together and not trample the internal Wicket > >> > > >> > implementation. > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > Regards, > >> > > >> > > > Pieter > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Sebastien < > >> seb...@gmail.com> > >> > > >> wrote: > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Hi Pieter > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > I am not sure to undestand your first point. What > libraries > >> > are > >> > > >> you > >> > > >> > > > > refering to? Internal wicket's library? A jQuery plugin? > >> > > Another? > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > About your second point, the ResizeBehavior does not > >> currently > >> > > >> > > implement > >> > > >> > > > > the 'resize' event (which can retrieve size & position). > >> > > >> > > > > To stay consistent with the current logic behind > >> > > >> wicket-jquery-ui, I > >> > > >> > > will > >> > > >> > > > > do a ResizePanel which will support such event. > >> > > >> > > > > That's not a big deal, I will look at this tonight... > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Are you using Wicket 1.5.x or 6.x? > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Thanks & best regards, > >> > > >> > > > > Sebastien. > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Pieter Claassen < > >> > > >> pie...@musmato.com > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > This is a general best practice question. I am using > >> > > >> > wicket-jquery-ui > >> > > >> > > > > > because I don't seem to be able to find a resizable > >> panel in > >> > > the > >> > > >> > > > > > internal wicket ajax widgets. > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > 1. Is there no problem loading new jquery libraries > over > >> the > >> > > >> wicket > >> > > >> > > > > > implementation? What is best practice? > >> > > >> > > > > > 2. I am looking for a way to get the resized panels' x > >> and y > >> > > >> size > >> > > >> > > > > > parameters into my wicket code? Any suggestions how to > do > >> > > this? > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > Thanks, > >> > > >> > > > > > Pieter > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > > >> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > >> > > >> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> > users-h...@wicket.apache.org > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > -- > >> > > >> > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> > > >> > > > Pieter Claassen > >> > > >> > > > Musmato B.V. > >> > > >> > > > e: pieter.claas...@musmato.com > >> > > >> > > > t: +31 877 848259 > >> > > >> > > > w: http://musmato.com > >> > > >> > > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > > >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> > > >> > Pieter Claassen > >> > > >> > Musmato B.V. > >> > > >> > e: pieter.claas...@musmato.com > >> > > >> > t: +31 877 848259 > >> > > >> > w: http://musmato.com > >> > > >> > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> -- > >> > > >> Martin Grigorov > >> > > >> jWeekend > >> > > >> Training, Consulting, Development > >> > > >> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> > >> > > >> > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > >> > Antilia Soft > >> > http://antiliasoft.com/ <http://antiliasoft.com/antilia> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Martin Grigorov > >> jWeekend > >> Training, Consulting, Development > >> http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > Antilia Soft > > http://antiliasoft.com/ <http://antiliasoft.com/antilia> > > > > > > -- > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > Antilia Soft > http://antiliasoft.com/ <http://antiliasoft.com/antilia> >
