Hi Guillaume, I can see there many of the actions we daily do with some effort by using the XWiki editor, so I am sure our users will enjoy a lot this new editor.
Just a couple of doubts. Perhaps they are about features not implemented yet or this could not be the better place to post them, but I would like to forward this message to some people here that will appreciate the work done. Here the doubts: 1. We currently rely on some Thunderbird nice add-ons (It's all text! is the winner here) or the use of browsers like OmniWeb to do find/replace actions. Won't be these features included in the new WYSIWYG editor? 2. Have you already considered internationalization issues? How could we contribute to launch the new editor simultaneously in some other languages? 3. As we try to use XWiki as the entry point for our workflow, import must not be of major importance for us (of course, it will really welcome as we usually receive, and keep receiving, contributions in these formats). But export, at least to RTF, is "critical" for us. Independently of the method used to export or to import (I see that officeimporter comes from a GSoC initiative) documents, why does the import menu is in the WYSIWYG and the export options only in the upper one? I understand that the export process could be accessed without editing a document, but perhaps users could expect to find the export options close to the import ones in the editor. Thanks you very much, Ricardo Guillaume Lerouge wrote: > Hi fellow XWiki users, > I've spent the last couple weeks working on designing mockups for the new > version of the WYSIWYG editor that's currently in the works. > > I've put all my work on this page : > http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/NewWysiwygEditorInterface > > and I'd be glad to gather initial user feedback on these mockups. Please > tell us what you think about them now so that we can improve the screens > before implementation begins at full speed. > > Specifically, I'm wondering about the following things : > > - Can the text be improved to make things easier to understand ? If so, > where ? > - Are some features harder to reach than they should ? > - Are dialog boxes & trays consistent with user models of how edition > software usually behaves ? > - Do you see anything that will make an user wonder what's happening and > where he / she should click next ? > > Please note that the colors are only indicative at this stage - a designer > will improve my work before we get to the final stage. I'll try incorporate > your feedback soon and will let you know how the subseuent development goes. > > Thanks in advance, > > Guillaume > > -- Ricardo RodrÃguez Your EPEC Network ICT Team _______________________________________________ users mailing list users@xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users