Guys,

thank you for great suggestions!

Am I right that you suggest using Trello not instead of ASF hosted
JIRA, but together with it, and are volunteering to support it as a
tool for prioritizing user's feedback?

Also, how do you think, should we then move further discussion to the
d...@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org as, I assume, you want project
developers to use it?

Personally, am not aware of anything that JIRA with the plugins can
not do, that trello can. But I see your point of having a simpler and
more user-friendly tool for the end user's feedback.

Although question about whether the benefits at the end worth
supporting two systems is still is still open, I would be in favor of
making an experiment and giving it a try, in case somebody volunteers
to manage second one.

What do you think?



On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Marko Galesic
<marko_gale...@progressive.com> wrote:
> Hello A B!
>
>
>
> I’m really glad that you like the idea! I made sure that the board’s voting
> is public. However, you *do* need to be a Trello member in order to vote.
> You can use your Google account to sign in or create an account through
> Trello.
>
>
>
> I found more projects that use Trello as a Roadmapping tool:
> http://blog.trello.com/going-public-roadmapping-with-a-public-trello-board/
>
>
>
> Marko
>
>
>
> From: A B [mailto:netzbewoh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 5:23 PM
> To: users@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org
>
>
> Subject: Re: Using Trello to Show Mid to High Level features in Apache
> Zeppelin
>
>
>
> Hi guys!
>
> I find the suggestion to vote via trello totally cool and would support it.
> So if everyone is OK with this, let's do this.
>
>
>
> I was looking for such a possibility to have a community process to
> prioritize something for quite some time (have also played with various JIRA
> workarounds) - but this just blows my mind. Wish I had known it before :)
>
>
>
> Marko, pls check if you set rights correctly - i cant vote.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:12 AM, Marko Galesic
> <marko_gale...@progressive.com> wrote:
>
> Hi moon,
>
>
>
> I see your point that there would be overhead in managing two systems.
> However, I don’t believe that working within JIRA will achieve what I’m
> thinking of. I’m impressed there are people who use JIRA and seem to be end
> users; however, I speculate that these are advanced users – edging on
> developers rather than purely data scientists. There needs to be a
> separation between what the users want and backend implementation. An artist
> doesn’t necessarily tell the rendering engineer how to program a
> photo-realistic renderer; he just says “I want it to be easier to do X and
> be able to better control Y”. I’ll keep maintaining the board. You are at
> least one person that is aware of it, and there may be others. I’ve talked
> with co-workers, and they like the idea.
>
>
>
> There are two big things I see preventing me from posting\editing stuff, if
> I did:
>
> 1.       I don’t have access to edit JIRA
>
> 2.       Others may not necessarily agree with my interpretation of the
> issues (I edit the titles and prune to what I think is relevant, which is a
> guess, at best, right now).
>
>
>
> The real thought behind all of this is that the community would use the
> votes on specific cards as direction (or at least give an indication of what
> people are excited about); however, those cards are curated by me : /. I’m
> biased. This is a relatively esoteric project, so there is some inherent
> protection against trolls.
>
>
>
> ---- All I’d ask is that votes could be reflected from this board to JIRA;
> it doesn’t seem like people vote on things, anyway ---
>
>
>
> I do believe that if Zeppelin gets more traction it will become the de facto
> tool for data science within the Hadoop ecosystem.
>
>
>
> Those are my thoughts,
>
> Marko
>
>
>
> From: moon soo Lee [mailto:m...@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 1:21 AM
> To: users@zeppelin.incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Brian G Durkin; Krishnachaitanya C Potluri; James J Boesger
> Subject: Re: Using Trello to Show Mid to High Level features in Apache
> Zeppelin
>
>
>
> Hi Marko Galesic,
>
>
>
> Thanks for interest to Zeppelin. Also really appreciate for asking
> involvement.
>
>
>
> About the trello you suggested, I checked and looks like you did nice job.
>
>
>
> In my understanding, beside of JIRA, you'd like to use Trello board to get
> users(who is not familiar with JIRA) requests and feedbacks. right?
>
>
>
> Personally, i think the idea make sense. There're definitely people who
> feels less comfortable of using JIRA.
>
>
>
> However, instead of maintaining separate issue tracking system for different
> target user groups, how about contributing to Zeppelin directly to solve the
> problem. So improvement can be done with Apache community.
>
> It can be documentation of how to create jira issue, it can be discussion of
> way of managing and organizing issues, it can be anything, we'll figure out.
>
>
>
> What do you think?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> moon
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:02 PM Marko Galesic
> <marko_gale...@progressive.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> I’m wondering if people involved with this project would be willing to
> maintain a Trello board for user feature requests. I’d be willing to
> maintain it, however I’d like to know that others in the community would
> market it to those who would use it (users). I’ll be sending this to my
> company’s data scientists. The administration of the board should be handled
> by somebody other than the users, however.
>
>
>
> I’ve started one here: https://trello.com/b/w7KDN7CC/apache-zeppelin I’ve
> taken what seemed like mid-to-high level feature requests and put them into
> “cards”, more on that later. This is a first pass. I’m open to feedback +
> adding administrators since this is really a high level reflection of what
> already exists in the Apache Zeppelin JIRA.
>
>
>
> I’m trying to base it off of what Epic Games is doing with their Trello
> board for Unreal Engine (UE is a video game engine\content creation platform
> for games ranging from small independently developed mobile apps to
> multi-million dollar blockbuster titles that ship on Xbox and Playstation):
> https://trello.com/b/gHooNW9I/ue4-roadmap
>
>
>
> There are “boards” (e.g. on the one I’ve set up: Interpreters, UI,
> Compatibility, etc), cards (e.g. Hive under Interpreters), card tagging
> (Epic Games uses this for indicating when that card would be implemented –
> specifically, in months), and votes (the board I’ve set up is a public
> board, so anybody with a Trello account can vote). I’ve also enabled card
> “aging”. As a card stays inactive, it starts to become transparent. The only
> card tag right now is “Wishlist/Backlog”.
>
>
>
> This seems more accessible and user relevant than JIRA, and it also does not
> include bugs. If there are performance issues that need a ticket, they seem
> to get labeled as an “improvement” – there are very few of those, though,
> and I’m assuming Epic Games has their own, internal ticket tracking system
> that is much more granular.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
> Marko Galesic
>
>
>
>



-- 
--
Kind regards,
Alexander.

Reply via email to