On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 08:06:30PM +0300, Yaron Sheffer wrote: > On 24/10/17 15:44, Ilari Liusvaara wrote: > > If you think RFC7525 is lacking, feel free to propose a -bis version. I'm > not being snarky: things might have changed in the 2 1/2 years since the > document was published (and 4 years since the first private draft), so it > may be a good time for an upgrade.
I do not think revising RFC 7525 before publication of TLS 1.3 is a good idea. And even if TLS 1.3 has quite a bit of momentum already, it will take some time for it to become widespread after the specification is published. Reminds me of HTTP/2. That too had quite bit of momentum and had quite a bit of deploymet quite quickly, but still has not even close to displaced HTTP/1.1. -Ilari _______________________________________________ Uta mailing list Uta@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/uta
