On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 14:24, Wade Preston Shearer wrote: > Evan, thank you. But, the real problem (in my opinion) is that the BYU > UUG is not well defined. It's members either need to chill out or there > needs to be some official action taken to decide what the UUG list is > going to be about... because "using *nix" is so broad that discussions > can be about anything!
That is not a problem, it is a strength. What everyone is saying is, you should have posted to UPHPU first. If you didn't get an answer, you should have posted to UUG or Plug next. They are bothered that you posted to both at once. I have my own opinion of the solution, and have talked with Jayce^ and Evan about it. What I don't get is why Andrew cares. He wasn't on Plug as of a few days ago. <imitation person="Rodney King">Can't we all just get along?</imitation> <campaign type="semi-satirical">Support email hygiene, execute all top posters!</campaign> -- Stuart Jansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED], AIM:StuartMJansen> Programming in Java feels like C without the sense of accomplishment.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
