On Sat 14 Feb 2004 at 09:56:22, Josh Jeppson said: > In Micro$oft's defense, I think a more "balanced view" would be to > provide a list of exploits for each platform.
As much as I like MS bashing, the people that will be going to their meeting will [largely] be pro-MS. Therefore, the comparison needs to be directly MS CIFS vs. Samba, and a little less confrontational, otherwise we'll turn off our audience. I propose a flier along the lines of the following: After you've learned how Microsoft tests their software, stick around and learn how you can be part of the Samba testing team. Samba is a free system that provides file sharing and print services to MS Windows clients. And since Samba is Open Source, you don't have to wait for some other testing team to fix it. "Samba-3: How to Integrate Office Information Systems and Cut Costs" Presentation by John H. Terpstra 1170 TMCB 19 Feb 2004, 8:00pm http://uug.byu.edu/events.php?id=121 -- Soren Harward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://theboard.byu.edu/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
