On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 12:48:31PM -0700, Soren Harward wrote: > On Sat 14 Feb 2004 at 09:56:22, Josh Jeppson said: > > In Micro$oft's defense, I think a more "balanced view" would be to > > provide a list of exploits for each platform. > > As much as I like MS bashing, the people that will be going to their > meeting will [largely] be pro-MS. Therefore, the comparison needs to be > directly MS CIFS vs. Samba, and a little less confrontational, otherwise > we'll turn off our audience. I propose a flier along the lines of the > following: >
I'd personally prefer a flier that doesn't even refer to the Microsoft meeting. Just say, "Hey, we're having a meeting afterwards if anyone wants to come." There's no point in making it look like the whole point of our meeting is to be right after theirs. It's just a nice coincidence that there will be a lot of pro-Microsoft people there. -- Andrew McNabb http://www.mcnabbs.org/andrew/ PGP Fingerprint: 8A17 B57C 6879 1863 DE55 8012 AB4D 6098 8826 6868
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
____________________ BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
