Gary Thornock wrote: > --- Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yeah, pine sucks doesn't it. :) Guess it's better than >> /usr/bin/mail. > > No, it's not! > > Although, neither one holds a candle to /usr/local/bin/elm :)
Hmm. Wasn't pine created because elm sucked so bad? Pine Is Not Elm? :) Pine was a leap forward from elm. I used to use elm all the time (mainly because it was better than /usr/bin/mail). Then I discovered the goodness that was Pine. Not to mention (I have repented, I swear!) Pico. -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
