--- Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gary Thornock wrote: >> --- Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Yeah, pine sucks doesn't it. :) Guess it's better than >>> /usr/bin/mail. >> >> No, it's not! >> >> Although, neither one holds a candle to /usr/local/bin/elm :) > > Hmm. Wasn't pine created because elm sucked so bad? Pine > Is Not Elm? :) Pine was a leap forward from elm. I used > to use elm all the time (mainly because it was better than > /usr/bin/mail). Then I discovered the goodness that was Pine. > Not to mention (I have repented, I swear!) Pico.
Yes, Pine was created because someone didn't like elm. Pine Is Not Elm, and that's Pine's major shortcoming :) It's getting harder and harder to find a copy of the elm source code (though, fortunately, I have my own copy in a safe place). I suppose I should learn my way around mutt one of these days, but as long as elm does what I want (which it does), I don't really have much motivation to do so. -------------------- BYU Unix Users Group http://uug.byu.edu/ The opinions expressed in this message are the responsibility of their author. They are not endorsed by BYU, the BYU CS Department or BYU-UUG. ___________________________________________________________________ List Info: http://uug.byu.edu/mailman/listinfo/uug-list
