On Tue, 16 Jun 2026 15:46:20 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Introduce a `PathResolution` to `ExplodedImage` to remove a lot of ad-hoc 
>> treatments of preview path discovery. Also some general comments and test 
>> additions.
>> 
>> One interesting thing is the mainline jimage is not mapping 
>> `META-INF/preview/file` to `file` when preview is enabled; it does map 
>> `META-INF/preview/dir/file` to `dir/file`. Don't know if this is intended; 
>> exploded image performs the first mapping, which differs from jimage.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Chen Liang has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a merge 
> or a rebase. The incremental webrev excludes the unrelated changes brought in 
> by the merge/rebase. The pull request contains three additional commits since 
> the last revision:
> 
>  - Review remarks
>  - Merge branch 'lworld' of https://github.com/openjdk/valhalla into 
> cleanup/lw-jrtfs
>  - Cleanup ExplodedImage and enhance SystemImageTest

test/jdk/jdk/internal/jrtfs/SystemImageTest.java line 113:

> 111:                     // Note: somehow this doesn't work for jimage if 
> file is in
> 112:                     // root directory
> 113:                     "!META-INF/preview/com/two.txt",

The comment is very confusing. It's just a file that exists only when running 
with preview features enabled.

My preference would be to not include tests that don't work with the run-time 
image, let's put them in the JBS issue to re-examine the jimage implementation.

test/jdk/jdk/internal/jrtfs/SystemImageTest.java line 114:

> 112:                     // root directory
> 113:                     "!META-INF/preview/com/two.txt",
> 114:                     // File cannot be discovered in any scenario

Just say that this file is never found.

test/jdk/jdk/internal/jrtfs/SystemImageTest.java line 247:

> 245:             assertDirContents(image, "/modules/modfoo/com/foo/bar", 
> "NormalBar.class");
> 246: 
> 247:             // No preview activation

The use of "activation" in the comments is very confusing.  It's just checking 
that a file is not found.

-------------

PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2545#discussion_r3427463480
PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2545#discussion_r3427465281
PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2545#discussion_r3427474371

Reply via email to