On Tue, 30 Jun 2026 22:53:42 GMT, Serguei Spitsyn <[email protected]> wrote:

> This update is for Valhalla pre-integration. It introduces new JVMTI 
> capability `can_support_value_objects`.
> The variable `_can_support_value_objects_count` is introduced for 
> optimization. It follows the pattern of the `can_support_virtual_threads` 
> capability.
> 
> Additionally, this update includes test fixes:
>  - test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/HeapMonitor/libHeapMonitorTest.cpp:
>    - Removed the `if (!jni->HasIdentity(object))` check  because it is not 
> needed anymore as the JVMTI capability `can_support_value_objects` is no 
> acquired by the test
>  
>  - These two tests are updated to provide both positive and negative coverage 
> for new capability:
>     test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/valhalla/VMObjectAllocValue
>     test/hotspot/jtreg/serviceability/jvmti/valhalla/SampledObjectAllocValue
> 
> Testing:
> - Ran updated tests locally
> - Submitted mach5 tiers 1-6
> 
> ---------
> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK 
> Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).

src/hotspot/share/prims/jvmti.xml line 10718:

> 10716:           When preview features are enabled and this capability is 
> enabled, then
> 10717:           the following two events are enabled for value object 
> allocations:
> 10718:           <eventlink id="VMObjectAlloc"></eventlink>,

"then the following two events are enabled for value object allocations".  This 
reads a bit like enabling can_support_value_objects will enable these two 
events. I think it would be better to say something like "events are sent for 
value objects when the following two events are enabled".

-------------

PR Review Comment: 
https://git.openjdk.org/valhalla/pull/2607#discussion_r3504872891

Reply via email to