Does this conversation seriously need to happen here? It's a pretty easy test. Take the same hardware that both support (or VM host), and install both. Pretty easy to tell NT4 always wins, and it doesn't suck down so much RAM trying to cover slower actual *operational* speed. It's not just faster but more *consistent* and understandable/debuggable. If I were to buy Microsoft and wanted to keep producing Windows, it would start by basing all new development on NT 3.x or 4 as the starting point. NT 3.51 with the beta/preview newshell wasn't too far from NT 4. Everything has been a downhill slide since then, seemingly with an ever-turning-over group of really green marketing people guiding the product development..
But that's just my observation and opinion. Wanna believe in the tooth fairy, that's your prerogative. ;) How about developing for win32s on Windows 3.1? -- Casey Allen Shobe [email protected] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ VBox-users-community mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/vbox-users-community _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe: mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe
