on 5/19/02 1:22 PM, "Terry Steichen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It would be nice to see a simple, informative, non-ridicule comment from > you. Lighten up dude...I was more joking with you than anything. Maybe you missed the plethora of ;-) > 1) Your assertion that I agree with you reflects something other than my > views. (Hint1: what do you call it when someone declares they know what I > believe when that is at odds with what I actually do believe? Hint2: It > starts with an 'A'. ) Huh? > 2) Regarding RAD, the advantage of making a change in the template and > running the change immediately is much faster than a recompile and > restarting the servlet container. (The ratio, for Tomcat, is about 15:1, all > things considered.) Eh? Your reference to RAD had nothing to do with recompiling templates. > 3) Absolute trust in the developer and absolute distrust for the designer > isn't 'reality world'. (I have another term for it, but won't engage in the > ridicule I object to.) Eh? I never said anything about 'absolute distrust'. What I was referring to was the fact that most designers don't give a rats ass about coding and like Tim said, the designer is going to balk at an extra confusing line of VTL every time they want to use a tool. I simply dispelled your points of justification for doing things the wrong way and you are getting all pissy about it. > 4) If your statement is true that appropriate code reuse is only achievable > by use of JSP, we're really in trouble. (But I don't buy it at all.) Eh? Where did you get that statement from? > 5) I admit to not knowing much about Turbine - For nearly a year I have been > using a different framework (with Velocity) that works great so I've had > little reason to learn about yet another one. Far from trying to 're-invent > Turbine', I've just been ignoring it. See, there is your problem right there...;-) -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
