hmm, now why whould they do a thing like that? perhaps so they could change to another codec whenever they wish? so what does it mean that they don't want to be tied to .mp4 *or* .mov?
Joshua Kinberg wrote: >In fact, Apple was pretty shortsighted in making up a new file >extension when there was no need to -- m4v is simply mpeg-4 with the >wrong name (and if you name the file with an mp4 extension it will >still play on the iPod). > > > -- My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us http://apperceptions.org http://digitaldojo.blogspot.com http://spinflow.org http://wearethemedia.com http://www.corante.com/events/feedfest/ aim/ichat: [EMAIL PROTECTED] msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: msandy spin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Fair play? Video games influencing politics. Click and talk back! http://us.click.yahoo.com/u8TY5A/tzNLAA/yQLSAA/lBLqlB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
