I'd say at $3k a month in sales you are in the top 1% of people making money
in web video. You're also not doing advertising, right?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:28 AM, daredolls <dared...@gmail.com> wrote:

> this event was the first live stream i ever got to see.  our lovely country
> setting does not come with the internet, and our lovely superheroine series
> routinely gets deleted for content after being flagged by pornographers who
> don't like our standards.  i wanted to see who prevails.
>
> i was grateful for the double audio feed, as it prevented comprehension of
> what appeared to be being said.  i was listening to the musical portions
> wondering if the second feed would be revealed as another big joke once the
> beats blended but they never did.
>
> somehow "there's no money in internet video" came thru loud and clear.  i
> am beginning to think, with our measly $3K a month in  direct sales that we
> are internet stars.
>
> --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, "elbowsofdeath" <st...@...> wrote:
> >
> > So I hear the Streamy's this year were a disaster in several key ways and
> have gotten all the wrong sort of attention as a result.
> >
> > There is some concern that it has damaged the image of the 'industry',
> although it may be easy to overstate this point. It certainly didnt help,
> but the 'industry' has enough other problems too, although anything that
> harms potential sponsorship by appearing to confirm potential sponsors worst
> fears (eg uncontrolled juvenile amateurish smut tarnishing their brands)
> sounds bad to me.
> >
> > Unfortunately there is a part of me that is wildly entertained and amused
> by the streamyfail, considering it to be some kind of justice on a certain
> level. This isnt fair, as no doubt lots of blameless hard working people
> have been hurt by the streamyfail, but I suppose its a natural consequence
> of my disdain for the way some of the more visible parts of the 'industry'
> went, shoddy emulation of the existing media. What better way to symbolise
> two worlds colliding, and so much wasted potential, than to have a slick
> awards show humbled by technical glitches and naked people.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Steve Elbows
> >
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Reply via email to