On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:09:23PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote: > Marco Hinz wrote:
> > win_draw_end() is used to clear the end of the screen in certain > > cases, e.g. very long, wrapped lines or the actual end of the buffer. > > > > Fold and sign columns get continued although that's not useful at > > all for the case of the end of buffer. > > > > Therefore win_draw_end() gets split into: > > > > draw_end_of_screen() > > draw_end_of_buffer() > > > > draw_end_of_screen() does does the same win_draw_end() did before > > and draw_end_of_buffer() will care about the actual lines after > > the last line in the buffer only. > > > > Here two screenshots which show the difference: > > > > http://imgur.com/a/V0oN2 > Well, I suppose there is something to say for both ways. What do users > prefer? if I were to vote (and it would be with the caveat that I'll probably never use the sign column in this way) I'd vote for the 2nd way -- the end of the buffer is the end, and no need for more eye candy. -- _|_ _ __|_|_ ._ o| |_(_)(_)|_| ||_)||< | -- -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "vim_dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to vim_dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
