On 29 September 2014, toothpik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 06:09:23PM +0200, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
>
> > Marco Hinz wrote:
>
> > > win_draw_end() is used to clear the end of the screen in certain
> > > cases, e.g. very long, wrapped lines or the actual end of the buffer.
> > >
> > > Fold and sign columns get continued although that's not useful at
> > > all for the case of the end of buffer.
> > >
> > > Therefore win_draw_end() gets split into:
> > >
> > > draw_end_of_screen()
> > > draw_end_of_buffer()
> > >
> > > draw_end_of_screen() does does the same win_draw_end() did before
> > > and draw_end_of_buffer() will care about the actual lines after
> > > the last line in the buffer only.
> > >
> > > Here two screenshots which show the difference:
> > >
> > > http://imgur.com/a/V0oN2
>
> > Well, I suppose there is something to say for both ways. What do users
> > prefer?
>
> if I were to vote (and it would be with the caveat that I'll probably
> never use the sign column in this way) I'd vote for the 2nd way -- the
> end of the buffer is the end, and no need for more eye candy.
+1
/lcd
--
--
You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"vim_dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
