No, sadly that is not true.   What I do is to stick an audio label on the 
back, scan it and then have someone record the "magic number" from the back 
and the number so that I can just scan and hear it later.

On Monday, May 7, 2012 11:56:39 AM UTC-5, Brenth wrote:
>
>  Oh, that's what I thought. Wishful thinking that one could just snap a 
> picture and read a new card when the replacements come in the mail, but I 
> guess not.
>  
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> *From:* Nancy M <nmira...@gmail.com> 
> *To:* viphone@googlegroups.com 
> *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2012 10:29 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Digit-eyes working with an Itouch
>
> The credit cards are not bar coded; they are magnetically encoded into a 
> special 'stripe' area on the back of the card.   The device includes a 
> Magnetic Stripe Reader (MSR).  To get the card to be read,you have to slide 
> it through the special reader that is part of the device.
>
> I think without the MSR, the device may be less expensive.
>
> You might want to contact serial io directly and ask them:
> http://serialio.com/support/index.php
>
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 7, 2012 9:47:54 AM UTC-5, Brenth wrote: 
>>
>>  I think the IPhone camera, especially the 4S could work better than the 
>> USB Metrologics they had for use with BCScan, before the days of 
>> Directions4me. I won one in a contest I don't use much, and the last 
>> product I needed to identify, Vizwiz worked on the first try. Are credit 
>> cards really barcoded that I could read one with Digit Eyes, or is there 
>> other hardware in that $700 laser sled thing besides a bar code scanner?
>>  
>>  
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> *From:* Nancy M <nmira...@gmail.com> 
>> *To:* viphone@googlegroups.com 
>> *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2012 7:43 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: Digit-eyes working with an Itouch
>>
>> Please note that Digit-Eyes is an omnidirectional scanner.  
>>
>> That is one of the ways that Digit-Eyesis very different from other bar 
>> code packages for the iPhone.   It can recognize bar codes whether they are 
>> right side up, up side down, sideways or diagonally oriented.
>>
>> It is not reasonable to expect someone who can't see to orient a code in 
>> respect to a camera.
>>
>> So we don't.
>>
>> I do agree that an iPod Touch + a laser may be a good solution for 
>> some.   
>>
>> You might want to look also at the piece I just posted on the KDC 425i, a 
>> laser sled for the iDevice.  The unit I saw in demonstration last week 
>> a) wasn't shown with the iPod touch (only because I didn't have one with 
>> me, my bad) and
>> b) didn't work with the iPhone either (because, according to the vendor, 
>> they didn't have a production copy of the software)
>>
>> Everyone uses their technology in slightly different ways and what is 
>> right for one may not be right for another.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, May 7, 2012 6:38:01 AM UTC-5, eburggraaf wrote: 
>>>
>>> Hi,  It's a matter of a couple of things.  First, While many people have 
>>> the time and skills and patience to look for barcodes on various products, 
>>> make sure they're the right way up, and so on, many more others do not.  My 
>>> client base tends to be over the age of 65.  I have a lot of duel 
>>> disability clients and ESL clients.  Obviously, if you are effective at 
>>> getting barcodes with the camera, you wouldn't want this for home use, 
>>> although it would be much faster and easier in a work environment. 
>>>
>>> Second, not everyone wants an IPhone.  I for example, have zero desire 
>>> to own an IPhone.  My experia pro is perfect for me.  If you don't want an 
>>> IPhone because you just don't want one, or if you don't want the outrageous 
>>> plans that canadians get shafted into, or if you don't want or need a 
>>> cellphone period and you just want a handheld, then it's the ITouch for you.
>>>
>>> Finally, it's been years since the ITouch has seen an update.  It should 
>>> get one, but it may not.  You never know.  We probably won't know until it 
>>> hits the shelf.  My clients need it now.  Many of them might not be in a 
>>> position to enjoy it next year.  Not to be insensitive or anything, but 
>>> it's just the way it is.
>>>
>>> If an ITouch and a kdc300 costs $900 and an IDMate costs $1600 then my 
>>> clients are coming out ahead in the consumer choice department.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>>
>>>          Erik Burggraaf
>>> Introducing Ebony Consulting business card transcription service, 
>>> starting at $0.45 per card or $35 per hundred cards.
>>> Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194
>>> or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com
>>>
>>>  On 2012-05-06, at 3:16 PM, Sieghard wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hello Erik, Nancy and Steve,
>>>
>>> My question would be why somebody would spend around $600 or $700 for
>>> a Koamtac bluetooth scanner just so he can get better use from an iPod
>>> Touch with barcode scanning. First of all, who knows if the next
>>> generation iPod Touch doesn't get a 5 MP auto-focus camera like the
>>> iPad just did. Second, for $750 you can go to Apple and buy an
>>> unlocked 32 Gb iPhone 4S and you'll have no more issues. In a way a
>>> good omni-directional barcode scanner is of course always better than
>>> the iPhone, I have a retail business and my basic USB Symbol scanner
>>> is quite efficient and forgiving at picking up barcodes, but before I
>>> spent this kind of money for a device that can do exactly one thing
>>> I'd rather buy myself an iPhone 4S or, if you are so inclined, wait 6
>>> months and buy the next new iPhone.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sieghard
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" 
>>> Google Group.
>>> To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
>>> To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" 
>> Google Group.
>> To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
>> To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" 
> Google Group.
> To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
> To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.

Reply via email to