The credit cards are not bar coded; they are magnetically encoded into a 
special 'stripe' area on the back of the card.   The device includes a 
Magnetic Stripe Reader (MSR).  To get the card to be read,you have to slide 
it through the special reader that is part of the device.

I think without the MSR, the device may be less expensive.

You might want to contact serial io directly and ask them:
http://serialio.com/support/index.php




On Monday, May 7, 2012 9:47:54 AM UTC-5, Brenth wrote:
>
>  I think the IPhone camera, especially the 4S could work better than the 
> USB Metrologics they had for use with BCScan, before the days of 
> Directions4me. I won one in a contest I don't use much, and the last 
> product I needed to identify, Vizwiz worked on the first try. Are credit 
> cards really barcoded that I could read one with Digit Eyes, or is there 
> other hardware in that $700 laser sled thing besides a bar code scanner?
>  
>  
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> *From:* Nancy M <nmira...@gmail.com> 
> *To:* viphone@googlegroups.com 
> *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2012 7:43 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Digit-eyes working with an Itouch
>
> Please note that Digit-Eyes is an omnidirectional scanner.  
>
> That is one of the ways that Digit-Eyesis very different from other bar 
> code packages for the iPhone.   It can recognize bar codes whether they are 
> right side up, up side down, sideways or diagonally oriented.
>
> It is not reasonable to expect someone who can't see to orient a code in 
> respect to a camera.
>
> So we don't.
>
> I do agree that an iPod Touch + a laser may be a good solution for some.   
>
> You might want to look also at the piece I just posted on the KDC 425i, a 
> laser sled for the iDevice.  The unit I saw in demonstration last week 
> a) wasn't shown with the iPod touch (only because I didn't have one with 
> me, my bad) and
> b) didn't work with the iPhone either (because, according to the vendor, 
> they didn't have a production copy of the software)
>
> Everyone uses their technology in slightly different ways and what is 
> right for one may not be right for another.
>
>
>
> On Monday, May 7, 2012 6:38:01 AM UTC-5, eburggraaf wrote: 
>>
>> Hi,  It's a matter of a couple of things.  First, While many people have 
>> the time and skills and patience to look for barcodes on various products, 
>> make sure they're the right way up, and so on, many more others do not.  My 
>> client base tends to be over the age of 65.  I have a lot of duel 
>> disability clients and ESL clients.  Obviously, if you are effective at 
>> getting barcodes with the camera, you wouldn't want this for home use, 
>> although it would be much faster and easier in a work environment. 
>>
>> Second, not everyone wants an IPhone.  I for example, have zero desire to 
>> own an IPhone.  My experia pro is perfect for me.  If you don't want an 
>> IPhone because you just don't want one, or if you don't want the outrageous 
>> plans that canadians get shafted into, or if you don't want or need a 
>> cellphone period and you just want a handheld, then it's the ITouch for you.
>>
>> Finally, it's been years since the ITouch has seen an update.  It should 
>> get one, but it may not.  You never know.  We probably won't know until it 
>> hits the shelf.  My clients need it now.  Many of them might not be in a 
>> position to enjoy it next year.  Not to be insensitive or anything, but 
>> it's just the way it is.
>>
>> If an ITouch and a kdc300 costs $900 and an IDMate costs $1600 then my 
>> clients are coming out ahead in the consumer choice department.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>>          Erik Burggraaf
>> Introducing Ebony Consulting business card transcription service, 
>> starting at $0.45 per card or $35 per hundred cards.
>> Ebony Consulting toll-free: 1-888-255-5194
>> or on the web at http://www.erik-burggraaf.com
>>
>>  On 2012-05-06, at 3:16 PM, Sieghard wrote:
>>
>>  Hello Erik, Nancy and Steve,
>>
>> My question would be why somebody would spend around $600 or $700 for
>> a Koamtac bluetooth scanner just so he can get better use from an iPod
>> Touch with barcode scanning. First of all, who knows if the next
>> generation iPod Touch doesn't get a 5 MP auto-focus camera like the
>> iPad just did. Second, for $750 you can go to Apple and buy an
>> unlocked 32 Gb iPhone 4S and you'll have no more issues. In a way a
>> good omni-directional barcode scanner is of course always better than
>> the iPhone, I have a retail business and my basic USB Symbol scanner
>> is quite efficient and forgiving at picking up barcodes, but before I
>> spent this kind of money for a device that can do exactly one thing
>> I'd rather buy myself an iPhone 4S or, if you are so inclined, wait 6
>> months and buy the next new iPhone.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sieghard
>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" 
>> Google Group.
>> To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
>> To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>>
>>
>> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" 
> Google Group.
> To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
> To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.
To search the VIPhone public archive, visit 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.
To post to this group, send email to viphone@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.

Reply via email to