I apologize. I didn't mean to call anyone any names or do anything other than engage in a serious discussion. I hope you and the list will accept my apology.

On 08/04/2013 12:27 AM, Joseph FreeTech wrote:
This is going no where with you, all others please accept my apology as I'm
moving on from any interactions like this name calling stuff.

Joseph

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Chaltain" <chalt...@gmail.com>
To: <viphone@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 10:20 PM
Subject: Re: Bad experience with iTunes Store support regarding app refund


Why do you assume I'm trying to one up you? I just don't agree with you.
That doesn't mean I'm trying to one up you.

Crowd sourcing and publicly rating applications is fairly common place
these days. It's not perfect, but if you get enough people on one side
or the other it becomes pretty evident that an app is either accessible
or it isn't. Of course, each person's rating is subjective but this will
be evened out in the aggregate. Are you saying that the ratings in the
App store or on Amazon are meaningless because each person's assessment
is subjective? If that's what you're saying then I wouldn't agree. These
ratings do have some value, although they may not be the be all and the
end all. They are another data point.

An automated test suite for accessibility wouldn't be perfect but it
would be a starting point. Again, it's another data point, and it could
be improved over time. It could also be used in conjunction with other
criteria, e.g. if you state your app is accessible in the App Store, and
it isn't, then customers and Apple can demand refunds. There are
automated test suites out there for accessibility, so this isn't a new
concept. It is true that they aren't perfect, and you're going to get
some false positives or some false negatives, but like I said, it's a
starting point and something to work off of.

I agree that accessibility is hard and needs to be well thought out, but
I'm not sure I see your alternative. It sounds like you're saying
accessibility is impossible so we shouldn't even try. I don't agree with
that at all, and I think discussions like this can help work out a
solution and some answers.

I'm sorry, but I also thought your analogy was silly. Even if you'd said
building a highway over the Atlantic between the US and Europe or
building a highway over the Pacific between the US and Asia, I still
would have thought it was a silly and pointless analogy. An analogy is
good when there's actually a relationship between what you're discussing
and the analogy you're making. In your case, you just picked something
at random that sounds impossible. Accessibility and assessing
accessibility is not impossible. It's hard, takes some thought and
ultimately will be a lot of work, but Apple has a lot of resources and
has demonstrated a commitment to accessibility, so I don't think it's
impossible, but it will be if people don't brain storm and discuss
different possibilities.

On 08/03/2013 11:31 PM, Joseph FreeTech wrote:
Oh no! not this list too! Why does everyone on these lists have to try to
one-up everyone else!

I prefaced my statements by conveying the Asian continent as an extreme
example. I think you understood what I meant.

Your crowd sourcing idea would not work because we're right back to what I
stated in regards to "who's opinion is best?"

The automated testing suite would not work as it will undoubtedly yield
tons
of false positives and will give the developer an "out" as he or she will
undoubtedly claim they ran their app through this suite and all looked
fine.

Because I've been here done that, I'm sorry but I'm now walking away from
this type of one upping. I think most got my point in that simply
demanding
for accessibility is not easy and involves lots of thought and. I just
wanted to convey a point which I'm sure all others got.

Joseph

----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Chaltain" <chalt...@gmail.com>
To: <viphone@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: Bad experience with iTunes Store support regarding app refund


If Apple were to implement something like this, I'd suggest using crowd
sourcing. I'm not saying it would be trivial, but add another
feedback/rating for accessibility and let users provide their input. Of
course, this wouldn't address the issue for the first few people that
had to buy and try an app before it's been reviewed by someone.

Apple could also invest in an automated accessibility test suite that
would give a rough indication if an app has met at least some basic
accessibility. This wouldn't be perfect, and there's still some
subjectivity, but it would be a starting point. Apple may already have
such a suite it uses for it's own apps.

It may be true that this idea hasn't been well thought out,, in that an
implementation hasn't been designed, but I think there are some
solutions out there that aren't as impossible as you imply. I also don't
think this is at all like asking for a super highway to be built across
the Atlantic to connect the US and Asia. I think there's definitely
something that can be done here, while building a highway between the US
and Asia over the Atlantic is impossible in many ways, not the least
that Asia doesn't border the Atlantic.

On 08/03/2013 09:25 PM, Joseph FreeTech wrote:
I believe Aman has made great points. Furthermore, it is not likely Apple
will successfully achieve a VoiceOver ratings system any time soon as
there
is just too much subjective criteria at play.
1. Who is going to be the person at Apple who has determined that an app
is
accessible?

2. What constitutes accessibility? Accessing 60% of an apps features?
70%?
90? 100%?

3. If Apple allows the developer to determine that their app is
accessible,
then you might end up in tons of wasted customer service time in that the
blind customer spending hours and days of their and Apple's time trying
to
convince Apple that the app developer lied because of X feature not being
accessible. I'm having a tough time accepting that someone would take
countless hours and even days of their time for $1 or $3. In the end,
while
the person might get a refund, they will have probably spent some $100 in
time for that single $3 refund. I've found that its much easier to let it
go. :)

4. There are some 500,000 apps in the Apps store, who at Apple is going
to
test all of those apps for accessibility? This means Apple will need to
train a large team of individuals to determine what is accessible and
what
is not or what is semi-accessible and what is not. All this means time,
effort, and tons of costs.

5. What exactly is meant by "Accessibility?" Apple will absolutely have
to
define and address this question before taking any first steps to achieve
it. There are still some holes in the ADA, and if the 600+ house and
senate
members including the president had a tough time defining "reasonable
accommodations," then it is likely a business will not want to get
anywhere
near this issue unless forced to do so.

6. In Windows 8, Microsoft has tried this accessibility tag in their
Windows
store and many developers have chosen to list their apps as accessible
even
though these aps cannot be used by a blind individual. Remember,
accessibility means lots more than just accessible to the blind. Again,
we're back to how will Apple implement such a system? Will they leave it
in
the hands of the developer, or will they use their own team which accepts
or
rejects submitted apps. If they do it in-house, this means training
either
all of their employs or this means training a select group; if so, this
will
have to be quite a large group.

Don't get me wrong, I think Apple should start somewhere, but it will be
difficult to actually develop such a system rather than many of us making
demands that have not been really thought out. :) I guess its like
asking,
why not just build a super highway across the Atlantic from the US to
Asia
since there is tons of area to build? Extreme example? Yes, but I meant
it
to be so to bring home my points regarding how to define, describe, and
implement accessibility. Heck, there are still some debating how one
accurately describes a screen reader.

Guys, I want the same thing you do, but if it is going to be done, it
might
as well be done right and done right the first time, so let's not make
hasty
demands as we might end up getting what we want--as defined by a single
individual at Apple.

Just some spur of the moment thoughts.

Joseph

----- Original Message -----
From: "Aman Singer" <aman.sin...@gmail.com>
To: <viphone@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: Bad experience with iTunes Store support regarding app
refund


Hi, alan.
You say
what happens when a sighted person gets an app and  they think it
doesn't
meet their needs.

With respect, that depends on whether the description accurately told the
sighted user what the application would do. If the textual description
and
the screenshots the app store presented gave an accurate description of
the
app, then the user has nothing to complain of. If the description was
inaccurate, then the user should get a refund. THe problem, of course,
for
the blind user is that the description may or may not be true. The app
may
say it can do X, and may in fact do X for a sighted user but not for a
user
of VO. For the VO user, the description is simply false unless it says
that
VO will not work with the app. It seems plain that the VO user is
entitled
to an accurate description, one which says whether the app will actually
do
what it says it will. Failing that, the user is entitled to try the
product
to see if the description is false. Failing even that, the user is
entitled
to a refund if the description turns out to be nonsense. Apple has chosen
not to allow the first or second options, it seems only reasonable,
though
not fully satisfactory, for them to allow the third.
Aman
    dealer of what it 2013-08-03, at 1:08 PM, "Alan Paganelli"
<alanandsuza...@earthlink.net> wrote:

Hi All,

My concern here is this.  So what happens when a sighted person gets an
app and  they think it doesn't meet their needs.  Do they get a refund?
I'd guess not.  This sounds to me to much like pulling out the blind
card.
What I'm saying here is, if there is a satisfaction guaranteed or your
money back policy in place then that's one thing but just because it
doesn't work well with voice over may not fly.
-------

Regards,

Alan

Go Chicago Bears in 2013!

Teenagers; Tired of being harassed by your stupid parents?  Act now!!!!!
Move out.  Get a job.  Pay your bills wile you still know everything.

Please click on:
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~alanandsuzanne/
There, you'll find free files of my arrangements and performances played
on
the Yamaha Tyros 1 keyboard.  The albums in Technics  format formerly on
my website are still available upon request.  Thanks for listening!
----- Original Message -----
From: Sieghard Weitzel
To: viphone@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 03, 2013 1:49 AM
Subject: RE: Bad experience with iTunes    Store support regarding app
refund

Hi Cara,

I agree and think that unless Apple comes up with a better way to do
this
they should be willing to give Voiceover users a refund without the
hassle. I must say, however, that I really like that 15 minute return
policy Google apparently offers, but of course trying to get Apple to do
something like that is not just a completely different ball game, it’s a
different sport!

If Apple was really concerned that this would be abused, they could
request proof that somebody is actually visually impaired or they could
limit refunds to a certain number per year. I am very sure that given
their computers they could easily track this on somebody’s Apple Id.

If you are getting involved in this feel free to use my below messages
as
an example, I am pasting the message I sent without the purchase
details,
i.e. order number and all that, as well as the response I received.
It was obvious that the person who responded somehow seemed to
understand
the situation, but on another level she apparently didn’t. She
summarized
my request by saying I “inadvertently “ purchased some apps which of
course is not at all the case and not what I said.
Here is my initial message and her reply which makes me think she really
didn’t get it despite the fact that she said it was an “appropriate
exception” and they would refund me the money which still has not
happened:

From: Sieghard Weitzel [mailto:siegh...@live.ca]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 9:04 AM
To: 'itunesstoresupp...@apple.com'
Subject: Voiceover inaccessible apps

Hello,

My name is Sieghard Weitzel. I recently purchased several apps for
tracking packages in order to find out which one offered the best
features. I tried a couple more, but they had free Lite versions which
allowed me to try them before buying the full version.

I am blind and have been an iPhone/Voiceover user for almost 4 years and
unfortunately I found that two of the paid and 2 of the free/Lite apps
have accessibility issues and I was not able to use them with Voiceover.
I
wrote to the developers, but have not received any reply as to whether
they might consider making improvements so the apps would work with
Voiceover. I used iTunes credit to pay for the paid apps and was
wondering
if it was possible to receive a refund since I have already deleted the
apps from my phone.

-----Original Message-----
From: iTunes Store [mailto:itunesstoresupp...@apple.com]
Sent: Sunday, July 21, 2013 4:50 PM
To: siegh...@hotmail.ca
Subject: Re: Voiceover inaccessible apps; Follow-up: 280679929

Dear Sieghard,

Greetings from iTunes Store Customer Support. My name is Alishia and I
am
happy to assist you today.

I understand that you inadvertently purchased some apps from the App
Store
and you would like to receive a refund for the purchase. I know how
important it is to have the issue resolved. I assure you of assistance.

Sieghard, after reviewing the circumstances of your case, we determined
that issuing you a refund for the purchase of "Apps" is an appropriate
exception to the iTunes Store Terms and Conditions, which state that all
sales are final.

You will see 6.70 CAD added to your store credit balance within 48
hours.
You may need to sign out of the iTunes Store and then sign back in
before
you see the credit in your account.

The iTunes Store provides a warning message that asks if you are sure
that
you want to buy an item. This warning can be turned off. If you would
like
to make sure that this warning is on, you can reset the warnings in the
iTunes Store by following the instructions in this article:

Resetting iTunes Store warnings
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1734

Additionally, you can make modifications on certain devices that will
prevent them from making purchases:

iPhone, iPad, and iPod touch: Understanding Restrictions
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4213

I hope the information provided would resolve your issue.

Sieghard, if you have any additional questions, please let me know and I
will be happy to assist you further. Thank you for being a valued member
of iTunes family.

Have a nice day!

Sincerely,

Alishia
iTunes Store Customer Support
http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/ww/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone"
Google Group.

Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing viphone@googlegroups.com.

Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.

Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing
viphone+ow...@googlegroups.com.

Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone"
Google Group.

Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing viphone@googlegroups.com.

Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.

Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing
viphone+ow...@googlegroups.com.

Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing
viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups
"VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
an
email to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.






--
Christopher (CJ)
chaltain at Gmail

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the "VIPhone" Google 
Group.

Post a new message to VIPhone by emailing viphone@googlegroups.com.

Search and view the VIPhone archives by visiting 
http://www.mail-archive.com/viphone@googlegroups.com/.

Reach the VIPhone owner and moderators by emailing 
viphone+ow...@googlegroups.com.

Unsubscribe and leave VIPhone by emailing viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.

More VIPhone group options can be found by visiting 
http://groups.google.com/group/viphone?hl=en.
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "VIPhone" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to viphone+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to