On 2014-05-22 14:33, Bart Vandewoestyne wrote: > > Hugh and list, > > I just wanted to report my findings with this first option: > > I have a virtuoso.db file of 142 GB and it took one night to dump it to > .ttl and .graph files. The .ttl and .graph files together take 242 GB. > > Re-loading the .ttl files into the RDF triple store seems to take more > time... I'm loading for more than 24 hours now, and I'm at about 60 % of > the total tuple count. > > Is it normal that re-loading the data takes significantly more time than > dumping it? > > Regards, > Bart
I forgot to mention that in my Virtuoso logs, I see the following messages appearing: [...] 14:11:14 INFO: PL LOG: Error in graph000053_000069.ttl 14:13:20 INFO: PL LOG: Error in graph000053_000160.ttl 14:25:38 INFO: PL LOG: Error in graph000053_000109.ttl [...] Should I be worried? Regards, Bart ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ "Accelerate Dev Cycles with Automated Cross-Browser Testing - For FREE Instantly run your Selenium tests across 300+ browser/OS combos. Get unparalleled scalability from the best Selenium testing platform available Simple to use. Nothing to install. Get started now for free." http://p.sf.net/sfu/SauceLabs _______________________________________________ Virtuoso-users mailing list Virtuoso-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/virtuoso-users
