Dave:

If my hypothesis is correct as to what the conditions are like in a 
void/microcavity, then looking at atoms in the void as ‘billiard balls’ 
colliding and rebounding as you describe, is I believe inaccurate; at least 
once the atoms shed their heat energy, their wave functions will overlap and 
become a BEC.  I.e., the less heat energy, the less the atom behaves as a 
billiard ball and more like an oscillating fluid…

 

Also, there will likely be some element of an E-field/B-field inside the void, 
and that will physically orient the motion of any atoms inside…

 

Wish I could be a fly on the void wall!

 

-mark

 

From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2014 9:10 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic 
crystals

 

I have considered what you are saying as being normal Mark.  Relative motion of 
an atom to itself is zero, so it is at zero kelvin as far as it knows.  When a 
second atom is added to the void, it becomes more complicated but the relative 
motion of the two must become zero many times per second as they collide and 
rebound within your assumed cavity.  During these brief intervals we have two 
atoms that are at zero Kelvin from their reference frame.  As you add more and 
more atoms to the mix the amount of time during which zero relative motion 
exists between them becomes smaller and less likely, but does occur.

As long as you keep the number of atoms relatively small that are required to 
react in the process of your choice, it will have an opportunity to happen many 
times per second inside each cavity.  Multiply that number by the number of 
possible active cavities within a large object and you get an enormous number 
of active sites that have the potential to react.

If only 4 atoms are required at zero Kelvin in order to react as you may be 
considering, it seems obvious that this will occur so often that a large amount 
of heat will be released by a system of that type.  When you realize that it 
seems to be very difficult to achieve an LENR device that generates lots of 
heat I suspect that the number of reacting atoms confined within the cavity is 
quite a bit greater than 4.  How many do you believe are required in order to 
combine and in what form is the ash?

On the other hand, if a reaction is virtually guaranteed once a modest number 
of atoms becomes confined inside the void, then the limiting factor might be 
that it becomes impossible to confine the required number under most 
conditions.  If this situation is the limiting factor, then a higher 
temperature could well allow more atoms of the reactants to enter into a void 
of the necessary type as more space become available when the cavity walls open 
with additional motion. 

I am not convinced that this type of reaction is the cause of LENR, but at 
least it should be given proper consideration.

Dave

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint <zeropo...@charter.net>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Mon, Dec 29, 2014 10:54 pm
Subject: [Vo]:FYI: Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic 
crystals

FYI:

 

Article being referenced is at the bottom, however, I wanted to toss something 
out to The Collective first…

 

One of the things that caught my eye in the article is the ‘room temperature’ 
condition… 

 

As we all know, atoms at room temp are vibrating like crazy since they contain 
the equivalent of 273degC of energy above their lowest state.  Thus, ‘coherent’ 
states in condensed matter above absolute zero is almost never seen.  The 
article’s experiment was done in material at room temp, so the observed 
behavior is a bit of a surprise.  Perhaps what they have not yet thought about 
is that the ‘microcavities’ have no temperature, as I will explain below.

 

This ties in with a point I tried to explain to Dr. Storms, and although I 
think he realizes my point had merit, he glossed right over it and went off on 
a different tangent.  This was in a vortex discussion about 9 to 12 months ago. 
 The point is this:

 

The ‘temperature’ inside a ‘void’ in a crystal lattice is most likely that of 
the vacuum of space; i.e, absolute zero, or very close to it.  Because, 
temperature is nothing more than excess energy imparted to atoms from 
neighboring atoms; atoms have temperature; space/vacuum does not.  Without 
atoms (physical matter), you have no temperature.  In a lattice void, if it is 
large enough (whatever that dimension is), there is NO ‘temperature’ inside 
since the void contains no atoms.  If an atom diffuses into that void, it 
enters with whatever energy it had when it entered, so it has a temperature.  
At this time, I have not heard any discussion as to whether the atoms which 
make up the walls of the void shed IR photons which could get absorbed by an 
atom in the void and increase its temperature, however, would that atom want to 
immediately shed that photon to get back to its lowest energy level???  So 
voids in crystals likely provide an ideal environment for the formation of BECs.

 

-mark iverson

 

ARTICLE BEING REFERENCED

 

Strong light–matter coupling in two-dimensional atomic crystals

http://www.nature.com/nphoton/journal/v9/n1/full/nphoton.2014.304.html

 

Abstract

“Two-dimensional atomic crystals of graphene, as well as transition-metal 
dichalcogenides, have emerged as a class of materials that demonstrate strong 
interaction with light. This interaction can be further controlled by embedding 
such materials into optical microcavities. When the interaction rate is 
engineered to be faster than dissipation from the light and matter entities, 
one reaches the ‘strong coupling’ regime. This results in the formation of 
half-light, half-matter bosonic quasiparticles called microcavity polaritons. 
Here, we report evidence of strong light–matter coupling and the formation of 
microcavity polaritons in a two-dimensional atomic crystal of molybdenum 
disulphide (MoS2) embedded inside a dielectric microcavity at room temperature. 
A Rabi splitting of 46 ± 3 meV is observed in angle-resolved reflectivity and 
photoluminescence spectra due to coupling between the two-dimensional excitons 
and the cavity photons. Realizing strong coupling at room temperature in 
two-dimensional materials that offer a disorder-free potential landscape 
provides an attractive route for the development of practical polaritonic 
devices.”

 

Reply via email to