http://news.discovery.com/space/a-laser-to-rip-apart-spacetime-create-ghosts-111102.htm
SPACE <http://news.discovery.com/space> A Laser to Give the Universe a Hernia? "it is hoped that theorized “ghost particles” may spill from the fissure, providing evidence for the hypothesis that extra-dimensions exist and the vacuum of space isn’t a vacuum at all — it is in fact buzzing with*virtual particles*." I beleive that we are doing this already in LENR. On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > The reaction force would be transferred to the virtual particles that form > in the vacuum. That force would accelerate these particles in a direction > that opposes the force of propulsion produced by the EmDrive. When those > virtual particles eventually encounter their antiparticle, the energy that > comprises their mass would be produced energy from particle/antiparticle > annihilation. Also all the energy added by the application of EMF would go > into the vacuum. > > This positive energy added to the vacuum would be countered by the > development of negative vacuum energy in and around the surface of the > earth. Such negative vacuum energy excess may speed up the passage of time > on the earth and increase the speed of light there. > > > On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 7:08 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I'm not mistaken about the gravitational impact of a fleet of flying cars >> suspended in the air by a reactionless propulsion, the earth would face >> many millions or billions of tons of net force pushing on it. >> >> The question is how long would this take to effect the earth's orbit >> significantly? >> >> Days? Years? Decades? Centuries? Millenna? >> >> At any rate it would eventually disturb the earth's current orbit >> dramatically. >> >> Something to be cautious of. >> >> John >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 6:26 AM, Roarty, Francis X < >> francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: >> >>> Axil, one more jump and you will be out on the limb as far as me :_ >>> you said [snip] In another thought, catalatic action of nano sized >>> particles and structures could be based on time acceleration by those nano >>> structures.[/snip].. I agree and even suggest that ALL catalytic >>> action is based on geometry – not as powerful as a skeletal catalyst or >>> nano powders [we don’t need relativistic levels of negative vacuum >>> pressure to shake things up/catalyze], dynamic changes in geometry at even >>> small Casimir levels will still oppose random motion , even looping forever >>> in a closed irregular cavity should generate friction for trapped ambient >>> gas [don’t ask about levitating pyramid calcium -lime blocks yet :_)]– >>> forcing random motion [HUP] to accelerate chemical reactions thru changes >>> in confinement. I think that simple catalytic action is actually a >>> Heisenberg trap based on lesser geometry. It puts random motion of liquids >>> and gas into opposition with smaller changes in negative vacuum pressure. >>> [in supra catalysts we would call this dynamic Casimir effect and the >>> confinement is sufficient that we hear of radioactive half lives being >>> altered in both directions which IMHO is based on which type of partition >>> [+ or -] the radioactive particle happens to favor based on it’s shape >>> atomic or molecular]. In normal catalysts I don’t think the radioactive >>> decay differential is significant – just like Lorentzian contraction and >>> time dilation only occur near hi fractions of C, I think dilation of >>> radioactive half lifes require a supra catalyst BUT catalytic action >>> derives most of it’s power to drive reactions from sharp changes in the >>> vacuum pressure packed closely together – since the geometry is stationary >>> it requires a moving medium and sharp irregular shaped geometries pressed >>> close together – the same as nano powders and skeletal cats but less >>> critical and less powerful. >>> >>> Citations: >>> >>> a 2009 paper, “Pinpointing catalytic reactions on carbon nanotubes >>> <http://www.physorg.com/news159199255.html> “, by Peng Chen et all from >>> Cornell Univercity in which researchers discovered that catalytic action >>> only occurs when this nanogeometry CHANGES at the openings and defects of a >>> nanotube. Cavity QED >>> <http://www.actaphys.uj.edu.pl/_old/vol27/pdf/v27p2409.pdf> , And My >>> blog >>> http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32155/relativistic-interpertation-of-casimir-effect-expanded/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Fran >>> >>> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 12:08 PM >>> *To:* vortex-l >>> *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems >>> way above the Theoretical Limit >>> >>> >>> >>> From a previous post except in part as follows: >>> >>> >>> >>> have referenced papers here to show how the confinement of electrons on >>> the surface of gold nanoparticles: a nanoplasmonic mechanism can change the >>> half-life of U232 from 69 years to 6 microseconds. It also causes >>> thorium to fission. >>> >>> >>> >>> See references: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&frm=1&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&sqi=2&ved=0CC4QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1112.6276&ei=nI6UUeG1Fq-N0QGypIAg&usg=AFQjCNFB59F1wkDv-NzeYg5TpnyZV1kpKQ&sig2=fhdWJ_enNKlLA4HboFBTUA&bvm=bv.46471029,d.dmQ >>> >>> >>> >>> Experiments showing the same mechanism as listed below: >>> >>> >>> >>> "Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid >>> targets in heavy water" >>> >>> >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0830 >>> >>> >>> >>> Initiation of nuclear reactions under laser irradiation of Au >>> nanoparticles in the presence of Thorium aqua ions >>> >>> >>> >>> http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0906/0906.4268.pdf >>> >>> >>> >>> =============================== >>> >>> >>> >>> In these experiments, nano geometry converts light energy from the laser >>> into vortex motion of electrons in a nanoplasmonic soliton produced on the >>> surface of the gold nanoparticles. Without the gold nanoparticles, laser >>> light alone is ineffectual in this type of experiment. >>> >>> >>> >>> The soliton produces the separation of the vacuum into positive and >>> negative zones. It also forces the entanglement of the soliton with the >>> U232 nucleus by pumping energy into the vacuum. This vacuum energy pumping >>> using EMF energy from microwaves also happens in the EmDrive system. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------- >>> >>> >>> >>> In another thought, catalatic action of nano sized particles and >>> structures could be based on time acceleration by those nano structures. >>> Rossi has used a nickel based catalatic micro particle and amplified its >>> effects by using nanoparticles of lithium to amplify the catalatic time >>> acceleration effect to a huge amount. This amplification is done through >>> SPP asymmetric coupling, where a large soliton feeds energy >>> superconductively into a series of smaller solitons...like a transformer. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Roarty, Francis X < >>> francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: >>> >>> Axil, >>> >>> You also mentioned [snip] In one experiment, a radioactive isotope with >>> a half-life of 69 years was reduced to 6 microseconds. >>> >>> That is 15 orders of magnitude reduction. Most halflife reductions in >>> LENR are instantaneous. Time could be moving very rapidly in the zone of >>> negative vacuum energy. There looks to be a way to share that increase in >>> the speedup of the rate of time with matter through the entanglement of >>> matter with the zone of negative vacuum...AKA the surface plasmon-polariton >>> soliton[/snip] >>> >>> >>> >>> I don’t know how these experiments were performed but I suspect that >>> only a small portion of the radioactive gas can be in the most negative >>> zones at a time such that the effect is actually greater still.. even if >>> fully contained in a cavity [instead of cycled thru], only the gas >>> migrating into the most confined tapestry of the nano geometry [1/plate >>> spacing^3] would receive the realativistic levels of dilation. >>> >>> Fran >>> >>> *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com] >>> *Sent:* Friday, May 15, 2015 2:34 AM >>> *To:* vortex-l >>> *Subject:* EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way >>> above the Theoretical Limit >>> >>> >>> >>> Dear Francis X, >>> >>> >>> >>> I am coming around to your way of thinking. >>> >>> >>> >>> Regarding... >>> >>> >>> >>> “when lasers were fired through the EmDrive’s resonance chamber, some of >>> the beams appeared to travel faster than the speed of light. If that’s >>> true, it would mean that the EmDrive is producing a warp field or bubble. “ >>> >>> >>> >>> The resonant shape of the microwave EmDrive cavity produces a pattern of >>> positive and negative vacuum energy that corresponds to the high and low >>> energy pattern of microwave radiation generated by electromagnetic >>> interference. The zone of increased positive vacuum energy may produce >>> longer lived virtual particles whose lifetime is proportional to the >>> "false" vacuum value characterize by the zone of EMF excited vacuum. But to >>> keep energy conservation of the vacuum constant, a positive zone of vacuum >>> energy must also correspond with and be offset by a negative zone of vacuum >>> energy. >>> >>> >>> >>> The lifetimes of these longer lived virtual particles may be long enough >>> to provide a reaction platform that meets the requirements of Newton’s >>> momentum laws. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Furthermore, there could be a connection between the EmDrive and the >>> LENR reaction. That connection could be the partitioning of the vacuum into >>> positive and negative zones. >>> >>> >>> >>> This might mean that the speed of light increases beyond its nominal >>> value in a zone of negative vacuum energy. In a homonginous vacuum, the >>> speed of forward photon propagation is determined by how fast the photon >>> goes from one virtual particle creation event to the next based on the >>> density of virtual particles produced in the vacuum by the averge virtual >>> particle creation rate. In a homogenous vacuum, If the average rate of >>> photon virtual particle interaction is steady, This steady rate of light’s >>> interatcion with the particles of the vacuum will produce a steady average >>> maximum speed of light through the vacuum. >>> >>> >>> >>> In a zone of negative vacuum energy, less virtual particles are >>> produced. This reduces the density of virtual particles encountered by the >>> photon per unit time. Less friction from the vacuum results, thereby >>> increaseing the speed of light through the zone of negitive vacuum energy. >>> >>> Time speeds up when the speed of light in increased. >>> >>> >>> >>> LENR seems to separate the vacuum into a positive zone and a negative >>> zone. The positive zone produces the fusion reaction, and the negative zone >>> suppresses the gamma and stabizes the radioactive results of the fusion. >>> >>> >>> >>> LENR will dramatically increase the decay rate of radioactive isotopes. >>> This might be caused by the entanglement of the nucleus of the radioactive >>> atom with the zone of negitive vacuum energy. The speed of time progression >>> in the radio active atom might be same as the speed of time in the zone of >>> negative vacuum energy. >>> >>> >>> >>> If this reaction is true, the rate of reduction of virtual particle >>> production in the zone of negative vacuum energy might be proportional to >>> the speed up of the rate of radioactive decay produced by LENR. >>> >>> >>> >>> In one experiment, a radioactive isotope with a half-life of 69 years >>> was reduced to 6 microseconds. >>> >>> >>> >>> That is 15 orders of magnitude reduction. Most halflife reductions in >>> LENR are instantaneous. Time could be moving very rapidly in the zone of >>> negative vacuum energy. There looks to be a way to share that increase in >>> the speedup of the rate of time with matter through the entanglement of >>> matter with the zone of negative vacuum...AKA the surface plasmon-polariton >>> soliton >>> >>> >>> >>> I segest this experiment with the EmDrive to verify this theory of time >>> acceleration. Place a gamma emmiting isotope inside an EmDrive enclosure >>> where the microwave interference is descriptive. If the rate of gamma >>> production is reduced and/or the half-life of the isotope is reduced then >>> the effects of negative vacuum energy on time will be verified both in the >>> EmDrive and in LENR. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Roarty, Francis X < >>> francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote: >>> >>> We don't know enough to answer the question because we don't know enough >>> about the origin of the force. Even if it is relativistic as Shawyer claims >>> and the spatial area occupied by the device modifies the encompassed >>> inertial frames that breach the isotropy there remains a strong likelihood >>> that an equal and opposite frame is created and the device is only able to >>> directionalize gravity to produce thrust..NOT able to accumulate a >>> buoyancy. IMHO his use of the term thrust is probably correct and that we >>> won't get a bubble from microwaves in a shaped cavity. >>> Fran >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] >>> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 9:50 PM >>> To: vortex-l@eskimo.com >>> Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above >>> the Theoretical Limit >>> >>> Hovering does not violate Newton's laws IMHO. Energy and momentum are >>> conserved. >>> >>> Bob Cook >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: <mix...@bigpond.com> >>> To: <vortex-l@eskimo.com> >>> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 6:44 PM >>> Subject: Re: [Vo]:Nextgen EM Drive's Potential seems way above the >>> Theoretical Limit >>> >>> In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Mon, 11 May 2015 18:58:16 >>> -0400: >>> Hi Frank, >>> [snip] >>> >The video states that m drive obeys Newtow's laws. It has no reaction >>> >mass. It does not obey Newton's laws. That comment was an >>> understatement >>> >bordering on misinformation. >>> > >>> > >>> >Frank Z >>> >>> Which of Newton's laws does it violate? >>> >>> Does a car going down the road doesn't have reaction mass? Does it >>> violate >>> Newton's laws? >>> Regards, >>> >>> Robin van Spaandonk >>> >>> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
