Axil-- Your group of “N emitters” is what I identified as a BEC or SPP.
Is superradiance and the coupling in a coherent system one and the same? If the large magnetic dipole is be enough, it could “conduct” all the cats in concert to get up to speed and in tempo and temperature to react properly without exploding. It may be that there is a a negative temperature coefficient in the cat or cats assemblage that reduces the rate of energy release (mass to EM and heat) as lattice phonic energy gets out of resonance. The mouse can apply the brakes by not driving the BEC or SPP or whatever “N emitter” happens to occur. Bob Cook y From: Axil Axil Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 12:14 PM To: vortex-l Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion Let us really put some theory into this idea and try to explain it simply. When the reactor reaches a stable thermal condition after it has completely started up, all the dipoles vibrate together as driven by the isothermal(even) heat. This even heat causes the dipoles to move together in the same way. It is like a room full of dancers moving to the same tune. When this happens, a state of super radiance sets in. In quantum optics, superradiance is a phenomenon that occurs when a group of N emitters, such as excited atoms in a dipole motion, interact with a common light field. heat is a common light field. If the wavelength of the light is much greater than the separation of the emitters, then the emitters interact with the light in a collective and coherent fashion. The wavelength of infrared light is between 700 nm – 1 mm. The dipoles are spaced together closer than that. This causes the group to emit light as a high intensity pulse (with rate ∝ N2). This is a surprising result, drastically different from the expected exponential decay (with rate ∝ N) of a group of independent atoms (as in spontaneous emission). Superradiance has since been demonstrated in a wide variety of physical and chemical systems, such as quantum dot arrays and J-aggregates.[ The effect has recently been used to produce a polariton superradiant laser. To simplify all the dipoles acted like a single huge dipole. The input power that comes into the reactor feeds all the dipoles equally. the magnetic field that is produced by the dipoles and output are all the same. All the nuclear energy that the dipoles produce is shared equally among all the dipoles. The dipoles release the same amount of heat like there was a single huge dipole instead of many individual dipoles performing the same dance step. On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Bob Cook <[email protected]> wrote: Robin-- Furthermore, SPP entities rotate and would seem to create a rotating magnetic fields. This could be a coupling agent to transfer nuclear binging energy to lattice heat. In a similar vein, a BEC I think could be a group of magnetic dipoles as long as each dipole is a Bose particle with 0 or integer intrinsic spin. Cooper pairs of electrons or protons I believe constitute Bose particles and could form a BEC. There may be a gyro-magnetic couple between Ni lattice paired electrons and Ni nucleons (and Li-7 nucleons) with the BEC being the coupling mechanism. Bob Cook -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sent: Friday, June 19, 2015 3:36 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion In reply to Bob Cook's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 22:54:43 -0700: Hi, Yes, that's basically what I had in mind. Note however that in order for net energy to be released a nuclear reaction of some kind has to occur. Perhaps Rossi's theoretician is correct, and Li needs to be stimulated to a higher energy level before the fusion reaction can take place. NMR might be the mechanism that does that. If so, then it should be possible to engineer a much improved device, by concentrating on the gyromagnetic ratio of Li7 and providing frequency and magnetic field strengths to match. However there is also the possibility that as the Li7 becomes excited, the gyromagnetic ratio will change (due to a change in structure of the nucleus). This could be another reason that the varying magnetic field is important:- it can "follow" the change and supply the correct field strength repeatedly. Robin-- I CONCUR WITH YOUR MRI (NMR) THOUGHT. It is my understanding that the resonance with magnetic dipoles of a nucleus is with a RF signal that invokes a small energy shift in the subject nucleus. These resonances are modified by a magnetic field. The energy absorbed in a resonant transition reflects a differential spin quantum number from the ground (unexcited) energy state of the subject nucleus. The energy associated with a single spin quanta is small. It may be possible to excite nuclear magnetic dipoles by more than one quanta and reach a higher excited energy state than one spin quanta above the base. The resulting "eximer" may not decay to the original base state, but to an entirely different nucleus with a loss of mass (spin energy mass) distributed as thermal energy to the rest of the coherent system to which it is coupled. In the case of LiAlH bonded to a Ni nano particle, maybe with dissolved H in the Ni lattice, all of which is a coherent system. Bob Cook -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 8:13 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Cat stimultion In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 18 Jun 2015 20:43:15 -0400: Hi, [snip] http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/02/27/rossi-natural-gas-powered-e-cat-not-a-matter-of-simple-heat/ Natural gas did not work. Its more than just heat. That's interesting. It made me think of MRI where resonance occurs for a specific combination of frequency and magnetic field strength. If a constant frequency is available then resonance could be achieved by regularly varying the magnetic field strength as would occur with AC current. Knowing your penchant for all things magnetic, I guess you have already suggested this. :) Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
