In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sat, 20 Jun 2015 16:26:51 -0700: Hi, IMO, there is no special geometry, however if you want to have your way, then there is also the possibility that any special geometry forms readily, so that even though one site is destroyed, another soon forms to take it's place. E.g. expansion <-> contraction, vaporization <-> condensation, &/or molecular migration may readily form new sites, if e.g. the average particle size is within certain bounds that are appropriate for them.
>Robin-- > >The problem with any particles with high kinetic energy is that they destroy >surrounding lattices. A nano particle would not last very long with fast >alphas around. And it appears to me that nano geometry control in LENR is >important for success. > >The energy in LENR must be released in small quanta IMHO. > >Bob Cook > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >Sent: Saturday, June 20, 2015 4:00 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Cat stimultion > >In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 20 Jun 2015 15:14:07 -0400: >Hi, >[snip] >>To simplify all the dipoles acted like a single huge dipole. The input >>power that comes into the reactor feeds all the dipoles equally. the >>magnetic field that is produced by the dipoles and output are all the same. >>All the nuclear energy that the dipoles produce is shared equally among all >>the dipoles. The dipoles release the same amount of heat like there was a >>single huge dipole instead of many individual dipoles performing the same >>dance step. > >I think that superradiance is just a timing stimulus. It's essentially an >externally forced vibration that just happens to be at the natural frequency >of >the oscillator, so it effectively ensures that all the oscillators emit at >the >same time. The reason it goes as N^2 is because each oscillator contribution >adds to the strength of the whole increasing the intensity, and creating a >stronger external forcing field, which in turn causes more oscillators to >contribute. It's a positive feedback scenario. > >However the interaction between an individual oscillator and the field isn't >very strong. IOW the overall field isn't very strong. So I wouldn't expect >it to >be able to accept something with the energy density of a nuclear reaction. > >More likely IMO is that the Li fission just produces fast alpha particles >which >thermalize in a solid in less distance than the thickness of a human hair. >Regards, > >Robin van Spaandonk > >http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html
