Jones and Eric--

  Jones wrote: “The 510 keV of Maly & Vavra is almost certainly incorrect,...”

I  would say Vavra makes a good case for .511 Mev in his paper on dark matter 
at  the following link:

http://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CCQQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fpdf%2F1304.0833&ei=VHeXVba1CMLGmAX4lLyQCQ&usg=AFQjCNGeR5fkfAu6tTJInn03b1pOsvgRiw&bvm=bv.96952980,d.dGY&cad=rja

He calls it a small hydrogen that is responsible.  
The reaction that creates the small hydrogen is an energetic electron and a 
proton.
I think Robin identified this paper a few days ago.
It is worth reading.
Bob Cook
From: Jones Beene 
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 7:12 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com 
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Fractional Hydrogen without Mills

Eric,

 

An electron giving up its rest mass and becoming a photon is NOT part of Mills 
theory.  

 

Half the rest mass - 255 keV is in play for Mills, spread out in steps. Robin 
has a theory with a similar value. The DDL is different, depending on a number 
of assumptions, and it need not proceed in steps – ala Mills.

 

This thread started out with another theory where there was an attempt to  tie 
this reduced mass value to the FQHE, but ½ is not an acceptable whole fraction 
for that (it must be an odd fraction). However, FQHE is a 2 dimensional 
phenomenon – as is Mills Orbitsphere, so there is natural crossover (except 
Mills avoids QM).

 

And any fractional charge relates to mass, since there is a linear ratio. 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mass-to-charge_ratio

 

I suppose Mills 255 keV value makes a good case for the lowest level favoring 
the 2 electron configuration (hydrino hydride or f/H-) since it returns the 
atomic unit to an uncharged condition.

 

 

From: Eric Walker 

 

Jones Beene wrote:

The 510 keV of Maly & Vavra is almost certainly incorrect, but there are a 
number of values in the range of several hundred keV which represent the total 
energy which can be released in 136 steps.

 

With regard to Mills's theory specifically (not those of Maly or Vavra), in 
some promotional literature for BLP that was promulgated over the list a year 
or two ago, I recall seeing some slideware to the effect that as the electron 
reaches the innermost level, it becomes a photon.  If this understanding is an 
accurate reflection of Mills's theory, it suggests that the electron will have 
given up all of its rest mass.  There would no doubt be some energy left over 
for the residual photon, I suppose; perhaps part of the rest mass of the 
electron, or its kinetic energy?

 

Eric

 

Reply via email to