I saw the papers from Leif Holmlid and Sveinn Ólafsson. It sounds as if they feel they have a product idea viable for commercialization. I am not capable of making a judgment but it sounds realistic. If correct we need neither AESOP technology nor to worry about the relation Watt/ kg - I assume. Electrical cars and low cost electricity generated very locally is my vision.. It fits with my general idea about small scale operations. As an example of how stupid our very complicated system is I saw some info from the prelim presidential rep. program. There are 4.5 million people working for the Federal government. In addition we have state and county and city. I also learnt that we have 85,000 pages of tax code. That is a stack, you need a ladder to reach the top of, if stapled on top of each other. Just want you to know that we all are supposed to know the content of those 85,000 pages or we pay a fine to IRS. I would really like to have one of those laser induced LENRs. It will of course generate a couple of thousand pages of tax code. Energy tax must be collected but we have lot of exemptions, for example if you are involved in fossil fuel you need to be compensated or if your income suffer from the new order:) I would keep my LENR hidden and claim I use no energy.
Best Regards , Lennart Thornros www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 3:39 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > In reply to Alain Sepeda's message of Wed, 23 Sep 2015 09:00:59 +0200: > Hi, > [snip] > >The > >non-energy commodities are also a huge issue, first and foremost minerals, > >which largely confirms the research that I I started with Olivier Vidal, > of > >the Institute of Earth Sciences 2 in Grenoble. > > There is no such thing as a non-energy commodity. All commodities require > energy > to obtain and process, and are at least to some degree dependant upon the > cost > and availability of energy. Some more than others, Aluminium being the most > obvious example of one that is strongly dependant upon energy. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk > > http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html > >
