> This may apply to the Lipinski/ Unified Gravity theory and experiments. This is the group that claims to have found a low energy window for lithium fusion - around 200 eV. Yes I think that my argument is independent on basic theory though and well aligned with sound basic physical intuition which any theory need to match. So sorry for mentioning Mills, I think that any good theory would agree with an aiming factor and that if we consider a system that increases the impact energy at each iteration in the end would reach a reaction at very small speed in relation to all known accepted experiments that need to have a high speed impact in order to have a high enough cross ration. This is a really good argument for not expecting the same radiation and would give an argument for why we don't see much of radiation in CF research. Maybe the energy is released through highly spinning entities or whatnot. Why not (sorry for my ignorance) radiation through a EM field that is spherical of the form
j_l(|w|/c r)Ylm(e)exp(iwt), with e the spherical part of x, and r the radial part. centered around the cm in stead of a photon gamma? Which behaves much like a very small particle. Regards Stefan On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Stefan Israelsson Tampe > > Ø > > Ø I think that Mills theory for two atom molecules can be used to > explain an increase in cross-sections that I've not seen mentioned when > discussing the recent notes from Louis DeChiaro. > > This may apply to the Lipinski/ Unified Gravity theory and experiments. > This is the group that claims to have found a low energy window for > lithium fusion - around 200 eV. > >
