Eric Walker said: " The orbitsphere is proposed to be an infinitesimally thin sphere of circulating current. The overlaying of spherical harmonics on top of this sphere seems to imply one of:
- The sphere is not infinitesimally thin and instead can vary in thickness, and the accumulation of charge results in a thicker segment of sphere. - The sphere is in fact infinitesimally thin, and the charge is represented by a vibration of the surface of the sphere in a standing mode (in which case the sphere is only approximately a sphere). - The sphere is in fact infinitesimally thin, and the charge accumulation occurs in a hidden dimension. Do you agree? " If you magnify it large enough I'm sure you will see some structure, maybe a thickness. But to a practical approximation I think a zero thickness is fine. I believe that what matter is is a singular artifact due to nonlinear behavior in space. A nonlinearity that needs to be added to Maxwell. How this nonlinearity behaves is unknown but what it does is to produce a crack or surface which can be sustained and stable under the right circumstances. Now if you want to add this singularity you need to add a distribution field as source terms on a surface to Maxwell and the most simple such distribution is a delta messure on the surface. What we know about this source term is that it does not radiate and from there MIlls produces GUTCP. Note that what it may be is just a mathematical correction that feels like a bunch of charges with mass etc is what we would like to visualize this as. But math is ruthless, nothing in the charge field or current fields could be attributed to physical quantities, it's just a mathematical correction with some properties, the result of this at a higher level creates our physical world where we get our intuition for, but that intuition may not return back to the basic building blocks - that's a circular argument. But sure the math also suggest that we actually have a thickness - just that it ain't certain. The only way to really know this is to actually find a model of the non linearities of the world and see what you get. Until then you may be right or you may be wrong. On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe < > stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: > > No it is not arbritary. It is a simple matter to prove that these charge >> distribution would lead to non radiation for certain internal standing >> waves. >> > > The orbitsphere is proposed to be an infinitesimally thin sphere of > circulating current. The overlaying of spherical harmonics on top of this > sphere seems to imply one of: > > - The sphere is not infinitesimally thin and instead can vary in > thickness, and the accumulation of charge results in a thicker segment of > sphere. > - The sphere is in fact infinitesimally thin, and the charge is > represented by a vibration of the surface of the sphere in a standing mode > (in which case the sphere is only approximately a sphere). > - The sphere is in fact infinitesimally thin, and the charge > accumulation occurs in a hidden dimension. > > Do you agree? > > Actually sometimes I tend to get a feeling that the whole thing is >> obfuscated. >> > > Me too. > > Eric > >
