You are making a valid point. My bet is on the exothermic activity within the fueled vessel since the other one should behave like any other random piece of metal. The real question is whether or not enough time was spent generating heat to eliminate the possible chemical reactions. I suspect not. And, careful calibration must be established to ensure that a real difference in temperature exists.
I approve of the technique of using an oven to establish the operating core temperature instead of heating windings with electricity. Both methods should result in the generation of core heat, but using the oven appears to be a significantly better way to balance the operational temperature between the two vessels for comparison. Dave -----Original Message----- From: H Veeder <hveeder...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Oct 20, 2015 11:26 am Subject: Re: [Vo]: Translation of Russian paper on Ni-H experiment It seems to me that based on the given data it is possible to interpret the temperature difference between the empty vessel and the vessel with "fuel" ( their quotation marks) as resulting from either endothermic activity or exothermic activity in the vessel with "fuel". Harry On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Bob Higgins <rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com> wrote: This morning I translated the recent Russian paper, "The Question of Excess Heat in Nickel-Hydrogen". If you are interested, you can get a copy of the English version from LENR Forum or from my Google drive at: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B5Pc25a4cOM2ZzVib0JtOWtyaXc Bob Higgins
