So if the SPP is able to accumulate sufficient energy it is able to generate neutral mesons or signed meson pairs, for example if more than 1 GeV it may generate a Phi meson with conserved states which then quickly decays to the kaons and then the other mesons seen by Holmlid?
Would it generate these mesons directly from the SPP or indirectly by stimulating nucleon resonance through the magnetic beam anapole you mentioned recently? Sent from my iPad > On 29 okt. 2015, at 20:18, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a SPP condensate involved. When UV kight is absorbed by the > condensate, all the photons are concentrated to a few SPPs who form it into a > meson. When there are more photons as provided in a laser shot, more SPPs can > form particles from the "SHARED" energy. The condensate is an energy > concentration device using super absorption where incoming photons produce > particles via specific SPP members of the condensate. This is how a laser > works. > >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> A comment on the THE FLEISCHMANN SINGULARITY as a clue to LERN >> reproducibility. >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-fleischmann-singularity.html#comment-form >> >> Ed Storms can test materials until the cows come home withoul LENR responce >> because the key to LENR reproducibility is time. >> >> It took the singuarity months to build up enough potential energy to become >> LENR active. >> >> No replicator could get the the various types of LENR applictions to work >> because of the tricky requirement for fuel preparation. We know now that the >> fuel used in LENR in all its forms must be prepared in a time intensive >> process. This preparation takes a lot of time and a lot of energy. The >> solitons that produce the LENR reaction hold a huge amount of energy. >> >> The situation is like a car with a battery the size of a building. It takes >> a long time to pump power into that energy storage device before it becomes >> active enough to produce high grade power with a high enough “voltage”. This >> is what Holmlid tells us. He says that it takes weeks of applying Laser >> power before the catalyst he uses becomes active. >> >> Lasers and dipoles don’t talk well together. Lasers produce plain waves at a >> single frequency and dipoles don’t take kindly to that type of EMF. An >> electron and a photon must have the same energy level to join together to >> become a polariton. That marriage needs a common energy level. Only a meager >> number of dipoles finely tuned to the exact frequency of the laser will >> become entangled. If there is lots of bumps and nanocavities, then the Laser >> light will become decoherent. >> >> Decoherent light( from an arc that R. Mills uses in the Suncell) is best so >> that dipoles at any stage of development will become polaritons. A scattered >> shot cloud from a shotgun is better at downing a clay pigeon than a 22 is. >> >> LENR replicators do not preprocess the fuel that they use and they don’t >> wait long enough for the LENR reaction to take hold. No one wants to invest >> the time and energy to properly prepare the fuel. >> >> This is a lessen that we can draw from Joe Papp. No one understood the >> reason why he invented a fuel preparation process. If the Papp fuel was not >> preprocessed, the Papp engine would need to crank for a week before it >> kicked over. Papp knew he had to load a lot of energy into that fuel before >> it became active. >> >> >> The various ways to inject energy into that fuel have differing power >> loading potential. Heat is the least effective method. Lasers seem to be >> somewhat more powerful but a few weeks to get the Holmlid fuel up to speed >> indicates to us that Laser power is marginal. Spark discharge and cavitation >> seem to be the most powerful method of power injection. >> >> We can determine how long cavitation takes to charge up the LENR fuel by >> seeing how long it takes for gammas to appear after the pump is turned on in >> the LeClair reactor. >> >> DGT could start their reaction in a few hours because an electric arc is a >> powerful source of incoherent EMF power. >> >> Holmlid’s effect is difficult to duplicate because most replicators don’t >> have the patience to wait for weeks to see positive results. >> >> The choice before the replicator is plainly stated; he can use a powerful >> source of incoherent energy or he could just wait for weeks while energy >> trickles into his power hungry fuel. >> >> That said see the next post... >> >> >>> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how it can generate >>> the mesons reported by Holmlid? Is there some mechanism based on this idea >>> where mesons are produced or can they only generated by very high energy >>> interactions with nucleons and require much higher energies than you are >>> describing here? >>> >>>> On 29 okt. 2015, at 19:53, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> From: Bob Cook >>>> >>>> Ø >>>> >>>> Ø Fran and Jones suggested that the source of the excess energy described >>>> by Holmlid is of a chemical origin (electronic potential chemical energy >>>> of dense hydrogen) and not nuclear potential energy long ago stored in the >>>> reactants. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> First part of answer: The Dynamical Casimir Effect was first observed in >>>> 2010. It is real, but that does not necessarily provide all the answers. >>>> The following is paraphrased from various sources. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The basic concept for LENR, is that the electronic chemical energy of >>>> dense hydrogen, with mass-energy in the range of 630 eV per H atom, is >>>> created by DCE. One way this can happen is when SPP interact with a >>>> Casimir cavity or pit. The electron becomes delocalized and possibly >>>> relativistic. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> However, it is also demonstrated by Holmlid that dense hydrogen can >>>> produce strong nuclear or sub-nuclear gain in other circumstances, aside >>>> from chemistry. Whenever gamma radiation is seen in an experiment, it is a >>>> good indication of the “other circumstances”. The DCE modality only >>>> applies to gain from chemistry and electron manipulation. The soft x-rays >>>> are easy to miss. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> One of the predictions of modern quantum theory is that the vacuum of >>>> space is not empty. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teems with >>>> virtual particles foaming in and out of existence. While initially a >>>> curiosity, it was quickly realized that vacuum fluctuations had measurable >>>> consequences, for instance producing the Lamb shift and modifying the >>>> magnetic moment for the electron… and in Casimir force. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> This type of renormalization due to vacuum fluctuations is now central to >>>> our understanding of nature….From early on, it was believed that it might >>>> be possible to more directly observe the virtual particles that compose >>>> the quantum vacuum, or convert them to real particles. 40 years ago, Moore >>>> suggested that a mirror undergoing relativistic motion could convert >>>> virtual photons into directly observable real photons. This effect was >>>> later named the dynamical Casimir effect (DCE)…. we have observed the DCE >>>> experimentally for the first time in 2011…. In addition to observing the >>>> creation of real photons, the discoverers found two-mode squeezing of the >>>> emitted radiation, which is a signature of the quantum character of the >>>> generation process. End of paraphrase. >>>> >>>> Ø >>>> >>>> Ø Is the assumption that the laser pre-conditioning of the materials in >>>> the Holmlid setup allowed the increase in potential energy of the >>>> reactants which then is later released as EM radiation and hence heat? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Yes. Most likely there would be a multi-stage process where the laser (or >>>> another light source) creates SPPs over time, which then interact with >>>> hydrogen in a Casimir cavity of 2-12 nm in dimensions. As it turns out, >>>> Shell 105 catalyst is extraordinarily nanoporous. Like a zeolite, but >>>> ferromagnetic. Curiously, Holmlid fails to realize this porosity >>>> connection. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The net effect is that the electron which once had ionization potential of >>>> 13.6 eV in the ground state has been boosted to 630 eV of binding energy >>>> by the DCE. This is an energy increase of about 46:1 per atom and it is >>>> chemical. But in effect, if the hydrogen does not escape, the energy which >>>> can be extracted by chemistry is endless (if the source is the quantum >>>> vacuum). >>>> >
