Holmlid said that a brief exposure of the catalyst to room light produces a limited number of mesons. So it sounds like all the photons from the room light are concentrated to only a few SPPs.
SPPs produce particles like Hawking radiation. It is called hadronization. See page 8 in this article http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0507219v3.pdf On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:33 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > So if the SPP is able to accumulate sufficient energy it is able to > generate neutral mesons or signed meson pairs, for example if more than 1 > GeV it may generate a Phi meson with conserved states which then quickly > decays to the kaons and then the other mesons seen by Holmlid? > > Would it generate these mesons directly from the SPP or indirectly by > stimulating nucleon resonance through the magnetic beam anapole you > mentioned recently? > > Sent from my iPad > > On 29 okt. 2015, at 20:18, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a SPP condensate involved. When UV kight is absorbed by the > condensate, all the photons are concentrated to a few SPPs who form it into > a meson. When there are more photons as provided in a laser shot, more SPPs > can form particles from the "SHARED" energy. The condensate is an energy > concentration device using super absorption where incoming photons produce > particles via specific SPP members of the condensate. This is how a laser > works. > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A comment on the THE FLEISCHMANN SINGULARITY as a clue to LERN >> reproducibility. >> >> >> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com/2014/12/the-fleischmann-singularity.html#comment-form >> >> Ed Storms can test materials until the cows come home withoul LENR >> responce because the key to LENR reproducibility is time. >> >> It took the singuarity months to build up enough potential energy to >> become LENR active. >> >> No replicator could get the the various types of LENR applictions to >> work because of the tricky requirement for fuel preparation. We know now >> that the fuel used in LENR in all its forms must be prepared in a time >> intensive process. This preparation takes a lot of time and a lot of >> energy. The solitons that produce the LENR reaction hold a huge amount of >> energy. >> >> The situation is like a car with a battery the size of a building. It >> takes a long time to pump power into that energy storage device before it >> becomes active enough to produce high grade power with a high enough >> “voltage”. This is what Holmlid tells us. He says that it takes weeks of >> applying Laser power before the catalyst he uses becomes active. >> >> Lasers and dipoles don’t talk well together. Lasers produce plain waves >> at a single frequency and dipoles don’t take kindly to that type of EMF. An >> electron and a photon must have the same energy level to join together to >> become a polariton. That marriage needs a common energy level. Only a >> meager number of dipoles finely tuned to the exact frequency of the laser >> will become entangled. If there is lots of bumps and nanocavities, then the >> Laser light will become decoherent. >> >> Decoherent light( from an arc that R. Mills uses in the Suncell) is best >> so that dipoles at any stage of development will become polaritons. A >> scattered shot cloud from a shotgun is better at downing a clay pigeon than >> a 22 is. >> >> LENR replicators do not preprocess the fuel that they use and they don’t >> wait long enough for the LENR reaction to take hold. No one wants to invest >> the time and energy to properly prepare the fuel. >> >> This is a lessen that we can draw from Joe Papp. No one understood the >> reason why he invented a fuel preparation process. If the Papp fuel was not >> preprocessed, the Papp engine would need to crank for a week before it >> kicked over. Papp knew he had to load a lot of energy into that fuel before >> it became active. >> >> >> The various ways to inject energy into that fuel have differing power >> loading potential. Heat is the least effective method. Lasers seem to be >> somewhat more powerful but a few weeks to get the Holmlid fuel up to speed >> indicates to us that Laser power is marginal. Spark discharge and >> cavitation seem to be the most powerful method of power injection. >> >> We can determine how long cavitation takes to charge up the LENR fuel by >> seeing how long it takes for gammas to appear after the pump is turned on >> in the LeClair reactor. >> >> DGT could start their reaction in a few hours because an electric arc is >> a powerful source of incoherent EMF power. >> >> Holmlid’s effect is difficult to duplicate because most replicators don’t >> have the patience to wait for weeks to see positive results. >> >> The choice before the replicator is plainly stated; he can use a powerful >> source of incoherent energy or he could just wait for weeks while energy >> trickles into his power hungry fuel. >> >> That said see the next post... >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Cooke < >> stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>> It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how it can >>> generate the mesons reported by Holmlid? Is there some mechanism based on >>> this idea where mesons are produced or can they only generated by very high >>> energy interactions with nucleons and require much higher energies than you >>> are describing here? >>> >>> On 29 okt. 2015, at 19:53, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: >>> >>> *From:* Bob Cook >>> >>> Ø >>> >>> Ø Fran and Jones suggested that the source of the excess energy >>> described by Holmlid is of a chemical origin (electronic potential >>> chemical energy of dense hydrogen) and not nuclear potential energy long >>> ago stored in the reactants. >>> >>> >>> >>> First part of answer: The Dynamical Casimir Effect was first observed in >>> 2010. It is real, but that does not necessarily provide all the answers. >>> The following is paraphrased from various sources. >>> >>> >>> >>> The basic concept for LENR, is that the electronic chemical energy of >>> dense hydrogen, with mass-energy in the range of 630 eV per H atom, is >>> created by DCE. One way this can happen is when SPP interact with a Casimir >>> cavity or pit. The electron becomes delocalized and possibly relativistic. >>> >>> >>> >>> However, it is also demonstrated by Holmlid that dense hydrogen can >>> produce strong nuclear or sub-nuclear gain in other circumstances, aside >>> from chemistry. Whenever gamma radiation is seen in an experiment, it is a >>> good indication of the “other circumstances”. The DCE modality only applies >>> to gain from chemistry and electron manipulation. The soft x-rays are easy >>> to miss. >>> >>> >>> >>> One of the predictions of modern quantum theory is that the vacuum of >>> space is not empty. In fact, quantum theory predicts that it teems with >>> virtual particles foaming in and out of existence. While initially a >>> curiosity, it was quickly realized that vacuum fluctuations had measurable >>> consequences, for instance producing the Lamb shift and modifying the >>> magnetic moment for the electron… and in Casimir force. >>> >>> >>> >>> This type of renormalization due to vacuum fluctuations is now central >>> to our understanding of nature….From early on, it was believed that it >>> might be possible to more directly observe the virtual particles that >>> compose the quantum vacuum, or convert them to real particles. 40 years >>> ago, Moore suggested that a mirror undergoing relativistic motion could >>> convert virtual photons into directly observable real photons. This effect >>> was later named the dynamical Casimir effect (DCE)…. we have observed the >>> DCE experimentally for the first time in 2011…. In addition to observing >>> the creation of real photons, the discoverers found two-mode squeezing of >>> the emitted radiation, which is a signature of the quantum character of the >>> generation process. End of paraphrase. >>> >>> Ø >>> >>> Ø Is the assumption that the laser pre-conditioning of the materials >>> in the Holmlid setup allowed the increase in potential energy of the >>> reactants which then is later released as EM radiation and hence heat? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes. Most likely there would be a multi-stage process where the laser >>> (or another light source) creates SPPs over time, which then interact with >>> hydrogen in a Casimir cavity of 2-12 nm in dimensions. As it turns out, >>> Shell 105 catalyst is extraordinarily nanoporous. Like a zeolite, but >>> ferromagnetic. Curiously, Holmlid fails to realize this porosity connection. >>> >>> >>> >>> The net effect is that the electron which once had ionization potential >>> of 13.6 eV in the ground state has been boosted to 630 eV of binding energy >>> by the DCE. This is an energy increase of about 46:1 per atom and it is >>> chemical. But in effect, if the hydrogen does not escape, the energy which >>> can be extracted by chemistry is endless (if the source is the quantum >>> vacuum). >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
