I wrote: Although I do not find Ed Storms's theory persuasive, I suspect I know how > he would reply to this. He might say that what MFMP have observed in the > NaI detector is a hot-fusion side channel, which he makes allowances for. > Note that although MFMP believe that the signal is strong, the absolute > counts appear to be pretty low. >
By "hot-fusion," I really mean anything that he does not consider LENR (e.g., ~ MeV bremsstrahlung, if that is what is being seen). But I should let Ed Storms defend his theory. Eric
