Well, if weren't slightly above background, it wouldn't be cold fusion,
right?

2016-02-24 12:47 GMT-03:00 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>:

> Well - OK... there is a tiny signal - but let's look at the counts per
> minute or per second.
>
> We are talking about 20 per second or so instead of a background of 4 or
> so. This is really "banana level" (bananas are slightly radioactive).
>
> You would need to see trillions of times this level if there was 5 hours
> of SSM - being produced by nuclear fusion.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H LV
>
> from
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OAcb975m_AXMFz25zcl07kllERqVjSbZsWv_P1A3xQc/edit?pref=2&pli=1
> Bob Higgins writes:
> "There was a significant gamma outburst measured in GS5.2 whose broadband
> high energy spectrum is not only unexplainable by known chemistry and
> physics, but may also not be explainable by many of the present theories
> for LENR!"
>
> He also says the the spectrum on figure 6 probably continues to rise on
> the left side but it drops off due to the detector's sensitivity limit.
>
> Harry
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Roarty, Francis X <
> francis.x.roa...@lmco.com> wrote:
> > Yes a little underwhelming but if they truly have a hands down recipe
> > to repeatable anomalous heat it will probably get a number of industry
> > labs and their funding off the fence wrt LENR. Now researchers can
> > prove to their management this is real.
> >
> > Fran
> >
> > From: Jones Beene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2016 9:44 AM
> > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
> > Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Big surprise or big dud ?
> >
> >
> >
> > Where is the big surprise?
> >
> > I woke this morning with anticipation - expecting to see proof from
> > MFMP of a 5 hour self-sustained reaction. Instead, we get graphs of
> > modest gain at the noise level and radiation counts peaking in the few
> > hundred per second – when we need to seeing a million times more - if
> > the radiation does indeed relate to excess heat at kilowatt level.
> > Yawn. Let’s hope there is much more forthcoming than this.
> >
> > What am I missing?
>
>


-- 
Daniel Rocha - RJ
danieldi...@gmail.com

Reply via email to