I disagree Jed. I think you have received a message as good as you could expect. COP is 6. The quality of the person doing the report and his qualifications you can judge when you have all information. Way too early to put up new obstacles. Yes, it is a pity that obviously IH and Rossi have different opinion about hoe to go on. It is not unusual for partnership to face problems - the opposite is unusual.
I think - without being able to examine the scientific strengths of the discussions here at Vortex - that there is a rather good theory being formed. Many details but I can hear that there is some kind of joint 'noise' in comparison to previous. Than we have Rossi's report about COP is six. This is a fall forward. I am sure money will be poured into research and result will follow. Rossi's X-cat will be talked about in Stockholm in June. I understand that if you believed it should come out clear theories and firm plans for automated assembly plants then it is disappointing. Really it is very good news (except for Rossi and IH, having to sort things out in court. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros [email protected] +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass. (PJM) On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Jed Rothwell <[email protected]> wrote: > If someone can give us a link to pacer.gov, Case No. 16-CV-21199-JLK, I > would appreciate it. > > This press release confirms that "the independent third party validation > test was performed by Dr. Ing. Fabio Penon, a Ph.D. in Nuclear > Engineering." As I wrote here previously, this is like having an HVAC > engineer look for radioactivity from a nuclear reactor. > > Jones Beene has a low opinion of Dr. Penon, which I suppose is based on > this: > > http://coldfusionnow.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/105322688-Penon4-1.pdf > > I agree this is nothing to write home about. > > - Jed > >
